If light can push solar sail, why can't light push the atmosphere toward the dark side of the earth? Why can't light push solar wind to high speed? If light can push solar sail, why laser beam cannot move a flame? Why Crookes' radiometer is not spinning in a hard vacuum?

Why scientists lie?

1:49 Look the spacesuit, there are 14.7 pounds per square inch pressure inside of the suit, how could the suit is not popped up?

What is wrong with people?  https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/radiation-and-antenna-mechanism.163476/

What happened at 1:30 to 1:50? Why she is floating up? What force is moving her?

Two Easiest Ways To Win the Nobel Prize

1. Prove light must coexist with matter, and there is no light wave in the vacuum of space.

The most famous double-slit experiment is a misinterpretation. Do a new double-slit experiment in vacuum, light will not show wave property.

The first person to do a double-slit experiment in a vacuum, to prove there is no light wave in the vacuum of space, can win a Nobel and change history.

If you have the tools, you should take this unique opportunity.

Put the slits and screen on the inside walls of a square glass container. Shine a laser beam on the slits, video the light wave interference on the screen. Then vacuum seal the container, video the interference disappear and only two bright lines on the screen as if light acts as a particle.

In fact, light is not a wave, not a particle in the vacuum of space. Light must coexist with matter/medium. Light is alternating current carried by vibrating atoms propagating in matter/medium.

Crookes radiometer spins in a low vacuum, but it does not spin in a hard/high vacuum. This proves light is not photon particles that have momentum. Scientists denied to see the fact.

    2. Measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle to prove it is infinite.

Use MIT 10 trillion frames per second camera to measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle, we can prove light speed in vacuum is infinite, and there is no light propagating in the vacuum of space at light speed.

His feet are not in foot lock. Why his body keeps up and down a little? What force moves his body? Would the same force moves the whole ISS the same way?

14:41 Why his body is not moving when his feet are in foot lock?

Why his body is continuously moving? Microgravity does not make things move at all.

Is time delay happening on both audio and video? Looks not, The video is continuing, the voice is delayed, why?

If you float or submerge in water, will your body/legs constantly move like on ISS? Why not? Because nothing is pushing you to move at all. So what is happening up there? Fake or not, open your eyes and minds.

Watch him flip over. According to momentum conservation, it looks so fake.

Why time delay for communication? We call the other side of the earth at almost instant speed.

3:00 He said this wall helps us to study flame in zero gravity, help us to improve fuel efficiency on engines on earth gravity. Total lies and BS

Matter is condensed atoms formed from charged fundamental particles. Energy is the motive force keeping matters motion.

Since matter and energy are conserved, all matters must keep moving, oscillating, acting, changing, reforming and evolving.

We don't know about the beginning, but we should know there is no ending.

A black hole can not be seen because strong gravity pulls all of the light into the middle of the black hole. 
-Wiki

Science is not a monkey story, all things have a precise mechanism. What is the mechanism of gravity pulls light into a black hole? 

Light direction and gravity direction are the same that perpendicular to the surface of any stars, how can gravity pulls light at the same direction? If gravity can slow down the light speed, why big and small stars have the same light speed?

Sun's great circle is 11881 times bigger than earth's great circle.
Therefore radiation strength from the sun is multiplied 11881 times on earth.
We see light from all line of sight of the sun.

Observe planets orbiting stars, atoms oscillating with their energy. All things have a precise mechanism. Follow conservation laws of energy, matter and momentum and laws of motion, we can conclude the future is predestined.

Our duty is to do the best we can, think positive and enjoy life.

He is full of BS. Electrons spin up or down? If electrons have spins, they will spin in every possible direction and speed. How can they select a certain angle and speed electrons to do the experiment? It is all BS. Why electrons and protons don't stick together? If gravity is 10^39times stronger, all matters in the universe will become a big star.

0:11 to 0:16  The time delay for communication is faked. 1:35 same fake time delay.

Why their bodies keep floating up and down? What force is at works? Wind?

Why video is continuing but audio is time delayed?

Why time delay? Calling around the world is almost instant.

Why are they keep floating up and down a little? What forces are acting on their bodies?

Would the same forces act on ISS?

Atoms contain 99.99% empty space is a science lie.

Water's compressibility is 3.9 x 10^-10. Matters are not 99.99% compressible.

Stars will never collapse, because atoms are solid.

Stars are not radiating energy into space, otherwise, the temperature of the universe will keep raising up.

Space is not expending, our constellations never change in the past few thousand years.

Gravity lensing is plasma on the sun or gas clouds in deep space deflected light, not gravity. How can gravity bend or slow down light speed? What is the precise mechanism? 

Relativity is based on the impossible assumption traveling at light speed to observe and predict. All imaginary illusions and impossible to be correct in reality.

https://www.facebook.com/ScienceAlert/posts/10157896777027518?comment_id=10157898616422518&reply_comment_id=10157904978037518&notif_id=1568612171756151&notif_t=feed_comment_reply

If stars are fusion reactors and radiating out energy for billions of years, why the temperature of the universe is not raising up and always stable?

If background radiation from 14 billion years ago is still there, Where is all the energy stars released?

• Joe Chang The law of conservation of matter or energy and the big bang theory cannot be both true.
  You have only one choice.
  All scientists supporting/promoting/teaching both are liars. Won't you agree?

  1

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 5h
• 

  Gary Gerrard Joe Chang Yours clearly isn't open. Eric has entered into the debate you've been searching for, and all you've done is attempt to gainsay and contradict. That's a sure sign of someone with no proof whatsoever. You've been shown up for the pseudointellectual coward that you are.

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 5h
  •  · Edited
• 

  Joe Chang Even religion does not worship two gods.

  1

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 5h
• 

  Joe Chang Do you know how many science lies inreality?

  1

  • Love

    Like

    Love

    Haha

    Wow

    Sad

    Angry
  •  · Reply
  •  · 5h
• 

  Joe Chang If stars are fusion reactors and radiating out energy for billions of years, why the temperature of the universe is not raising up and always stable?

  1

  • Love
  •  · Reply
  •  · 5h
• 

  Joe Chang Gary Gerrard Eric Dollard? He is halfway there. He said the sun is a transformer, it is, in fact, a generator.

  1

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 4h
• 

  Joe Chang Theory Of The Sun
  
  The Sun is an alternating current generator and a two-way antenna. Its electric energy oscillates at radius direction. The Sun is also a perpetual machine.…See More

https://www.facebook.com/NASA/posts/10157427272206772?comment_id=668280920242248&reply_comment_id=120262706022941&notif_id=1568540736706916&notif_t=feed_comment_reply

https://www.facebook.com/NASA/posts/10157427272206772?comment_id=668280920242248&reply_comment_id=697849070683121&notif_id=1568540736706916&notif_t=feed_comment_reply

Solar wind is impossible existing. Solar sail is impossible working.

Why?

If solar wind is real, if light can accelerate solar sail, then light will accelerate solar wind to light speed giving enough time, then all the light speed solar winds/charged particles from all the stars around us will destroy us instantly.

If solar wind is real, where are all the charged particles from all the solar winds from all the stars from all the past? Vanished into space? Landed on planets?

Solar wind causes polar lights is a lie. If there are charged particles come from the Sun striking earth atmosphere, their direction must be Sun-earth direction straight line. Impossible to cause swirling polar lights.

When the charged particles from the sun strike atoms and molecules in Earth’s atmosphere, they excite those atoms, causing them to light up. Wiki

If this is true, those charged particles will reform into hydrogen atoms and keep increasing in the air. Do we have hydrogen PPM raising?

If solar wind and photon particles strike atmosphere is true, then the sun-facing side atmosphere should be thinner than the dark side.

Relativity in a picture    https://www.facebook.com/groups/ScienceMemes/530765471069516/?comment_id=530936197719110&notif_id=1568498591232320&notif_t=group_comment_follow

Gravity     How is gravity formed?   https://www.facebook.com/groups/284686778813571/?multi_permalinks=441954456420135&comment_id=442345086381072&notif_id=1568513303055086&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic

How does a star become a supernova or a black hole? How does the star decide which one to turn into?
Asked by: Mudita Upman

Answer
Stars are sustained by the nuclear fusion reactions taking place in their cores. For stars on the main sequence, such as our own Sun, this mostly involves combing hydrogen to form helium. The energy that these reactions produce is enough to support their mass against its own gravity.

Wrong. Stars are not fusion reactors. Stars are stable AC generators renewing its own energy. All scientists lied/mistaken.

All the good stuff in the comments.   https://www.facebook.com/NASA/posts/10157427272206772?comment_id=509599896506055&notif_id=1568432591020032&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic

All things/phenomena in nature have a precise mechanism. Science is based on search, discover and prove those mechanisms. That is why we have laws, theories, hypothesizes. If you cannot understand simple laws like energy conservation, how can you understand QM or GR? Are you just fooling yourself, read and believe and repeat to show off knowledge without knowing the mechanism supported it? Be honest, my friends.

The law of conservation of matter or energy and the big bang theory cannot be both true.
You have only one choice.
All scientists supporting/promoting/teaching both are liars. 
Won't you agree? Even religion does not worship two gods.

An open letter to the Breakthrough Prize


You people are so stupid. Black holes are scientist's toys to scam $ and fame. Black holes are impossible to exist. Here are the reasons. Hope you guys have open minds and rational thinking, but I highly doubt. You rewarded fake gravity wave detection and fake black hole picture taking.

1. A black hole is a place in space where gravity pulls so much that even light can not get out. The gravity is so strong because the matter has been squeezed into a tiny space. This can happen when a star is dying. Wiki

If this is true before the star is dying, what is it? A star we can see? Does it has stronger gravity to pull light into it? Why not? If so, are those big stars should be a black hole in the beginning?

2. A black hole can not be seen because strong gravity pulls all of the light into the middle of the black hole. Wiki

Science is not a monkey story, all things have a precise mechanism. What is the mechanism of gravity pulls light into a black hole? Light direction and gravity direction are the same that perpendicular to the surface of any stars, how can gravity pulls light at the same direction even if gravity can bend light? If gravity can slow down the light speed, why big and small stars have the same light speed?

3. Are stars gravity bend light the same way as black holes gravity bend light? What is the precise mechanism?

If gravity is 10^39 times stronger, the universe will become one big star. How come electron and proton in a hydrogen atom don't stick together? How can you accept the standard model of atomic structure?

Electrostatic attraction force between electron and proton is 10^39 times stronger than gravity attraction force. It is impossible that electron can be orbiting/clouding/standing waving around proton to form a stable hydrogen atom.

Joe Chang

3小時

Theory Of Magnetism And Electromagnetic Induction

Ferromagnetic material has a special property – it can be magnetizing to create temporary magnetic domains.

Every magnetic domain contains two atoms. When an electron moves from an atom to the next atom and stays there temporarily, the two atoms become a temporary magnetic domain.

⋯⋯更多

2你和其他 1 人

22則留言

讚

留言

留言

• 

  Jun Jonathan Show me an electric transformer that runs on electrostatic induction.

  • 讚
  •  · 回覆
  •  · 2小時
  •  · 已編輯
  隱藏20則回覆

  • 

    Joe Chang Hold 2 billion electrons in each hand, feel the repulsion force between two hands? No matter how long are your arms, the force F=Ke x 4B^2/R^2 is always there. Now wave one hand, feel the other hand waving at same rate?

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 2小時
  • 

    Joe Chang Simultaneously, instantly over any distance.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 2小時
    •  · 已編輯
  • 

    Jun Jonathan That is not a transformer. A transformer is a device that converts alternating current from one voltage to another (e.g. 100v, 110v, 220v). You can buy a cheap one at US$4. So find me a transformer that runs on electrostatic induction.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 2小時
    •  · 已編輯
  • 

    Joe Chang Same principle, same mechanism. The repulsion force between free electrons on the two coils conducts EMF.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 2小時
  • 

    Jun Jonathan Different principles. Changing current is not necessary for electrostatic induction. It is for electromagnetic induction.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 2小時
    •  · 已編輯
  • 

    Joe Chang All EM phenomena are in fact E phenomena. I can prove it. Light strength decays at 1/r^2. Magnetic force/field strength decays at 1/r^3. Therefore light is not EM but E.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 2小時
  • 

    Jun Jonathan What has light got to do with transformers?

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 1小時
  • 

    Joe Chang I am saying all EM theories are misinterpretation of E force at work, current in transformers has nothing to do magnetic induction. Magnetic force/field is just circular electric force/field. This is fact, and wake up call for all scientists worship EM theory.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 1小時
  • 

    Jun Jonathan Current in transformers has everything to do do with magnetic induction.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 1小時
  • 

    Jun Jonathan Changing current is everything for a transformer. A transformer cannot work on DC but works on AC. Magnetic induction explains it. Your theory makes no distinction between AC and DC. It just concerns itself with presence of electrons.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 1小時
    •  · 已編輯
  • 

    Joe Chang Hold magnets in both hands to replace electrons so you can feel the repulsion force between your hands. Now if you wave one hand in and out, it is radiation, up and down, it is induction. Both are energy over distance. The later is the mechanism of the transformer. The radiation is the mechanism of light. Thank you for the question.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 1小時
  • 

    Jun Jonathan Moving your hands holding the magnets up and down does not make a distinction between AC and DC.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 1小時
    •  · 已編輯
  • 

    Joe Chang It does, try it, the other hand must/will move in the opposite direction due to the repulsion force. If attraction force, both hands will move in the same direction, due to the attraction force. Force and motion rule the universe. As always, good question.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 1小時
  • 

    Joe Chang My magnets decayed 1/2 cus I tried too much.

    1

    • 哈
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 59分鐘
  • 

    Joe Chang up and down, you know.

    1

    • 哈
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 58分鐘
  • 

    Jun Jonathan It does not make a distinction between AC and DC. Find out why a transformer works with AC but not on DC. It will clear your mind on the difference between electrostatic induction and electromagnetic induction. Be open minded.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 55分鐘
    •  · 已編輯
  • 

    Joe Chang Move your hand up and down, the other hand will down and up, move one hand up and up and up, the other hand only move down once. Perfectly explained AC and DC. Be open-minded.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 47分鐘
    •  · 已編輯
  • 

    Jun Jonathan Ok, makes sense. By the way, I am just discussing electromagnetic induction now. Going back, electrostatic induction does not require current at all, just electrically charged objects. Static electricity also does not make a transformer work.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 26分鐘
    •  · 已編輯
  • 

    Jun Jonathan You mentioned "Electromagnetic induction is a misinterpretation of electrostatic induction." Kindly explain using your electrostatic induction principle why AC makes a transformer work but DC and static electricity do not.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 17分鐘
  • 

    Joe Chang Transformers use iron core to transfer AC. AC in coil 1 magnetizes the core to become electromagnet, The magnet domains in the core changes direction accordingly, induces AC in coil 2 and 3. Good question.

    • 讚
    •  · 回覆
    •  · 9分鐘

  
• 

  S.m.hasibul Ahsan https://engineering-and-science.com/index.html

  

  ENGINEERING-AND-SCIENCE.COM

  theoretical physics topics, hasibul ahsan, Dr. Golam Mohammed…

  theoretical physics topics, hasibul ahsan, Dr. Golam Mohammed Bhuiyan

  • 讚
  •  · 回覆
  •  · 13分鐘