Joe Chang
話題高手 · 8月26日下午1:58 · tag新增主題
Science is controlled religion. No matter how much evidence, the
shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes. For
example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the
godfather of quantum concept said:
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer
to the answer to the question, “What are light quanta?” Nowadays every
Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -
Einstein 1955
Now every scientist photon this, photon that, quantum everything, all
BS. Do you understand?
Neil? How photon can pass through water at same speed without slowing
down like a real particle? How photons can accelerate from water into air? What
is the mechanism? Magic?
How matter tells space how to curve? How space tells matter how to
move? Fart? Do you know when you are farting, many monkeys are farting
at the same time at many different places?
36James Allison、Keredine A Ghannoum和其他34人
525則留言
讚
留言
留言
Peter Scott-Morgan
Peter Scott-Morgan Are you drunk?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I don't drink. You?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Peter Scott-Morgan
Peter Scott-Morgan Joe Chang no, but I don’t talk about farting with a
load of monkeys...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
檢視另7則回覆
Josh Rozenfeld
Josh Rozenfeld I would suggest business, not religion.
4
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer photon does!!!!!! slow down underwaterz. read again!
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Steve Schrader
Steve Schrader there are no photons, therefore they cannot "slow down"
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer the photon energy slows down.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
檢視另5則回覆
Shawn Edward
Shawn Edward 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 bruuuuh. You needa stop smokin them fuckin
dick hairs...
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones
Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones Come on Joe Chang, need a link please.
Get the truth out there. I understand your despise for mainstream, you
are right but pass on the knowledge.....I am trying to get what you
are saying....? I thought you might like this, your
thoughts........https://www.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
YOUTUBE.COM
💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
4
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Ken's theory of magnetism is incorrect. Theory Of Magnetism
And Electromagnetic Induction
Ferromagnetic material has a special property – it can be magnetizing
to create temporary magnetic domains.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Tyler Schwarzkopf
Tyler Schwarzkopf Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones tattooed buddha 😂
he’s a fun guy to listen to though I’ll give him that
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
檢視另 1 則回覆
Dan Hughes
Dan Hughes Science is philosophical naturalism... science can never
return an explanation that is not material because it is
philosophically limited to material explanations only...
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Everything has a precise mechanism. Without it no theory is correct.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Dan Hughes
Dan Hughes Yep... that's the assumption of naturalism...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Lights rate of induction changes due to the relative
permittivity and permeability of the medium of induction.
Experimentally demonstrated by Morton Spears.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
隱藏67則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Light is visible alternating current within
atoms/medium/matter. No light travels in vacuum space, light must
coexist with matter.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes and?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If light must coexist with matter, no light travels in
vacuum space. How light from the Sun can light up earth and moon?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Potential travels in a vacuum. It becomes light when it
interacts with gross matter. Also space is not a vacuum as you think
of because there is still vacuum energy density.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman It's not nothing. There is no such thing as empty space.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman You seem to have a problem with the non-physical. What
is your response to the fact that non-local consciousness has been
empirically and experimentally demonstrated?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Do you believe consciousness is a product of the
physical world? Just random chemical reactions in a bag of meat?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman What potential travels in a vacuum? What is
precise mechanism? How it becomes light? What is vacuum energy?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman The air around us only take up 0.1% space,
99.9% space around us is vacuum. Do you agree?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No such thing as nothing. Even the 99.9% is full of energy.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What exactly is energy? How empty space carry energy? Don't
fart, tell the fact.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman It is important to realize that in physics
today, we have no knowledge of what energy is. We do not have a
picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is
not that way. -Feynman
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Where isn't consciousness Joe?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman If consciousness is non-local it must be everywhere
right? Even in a vacuum.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman I am not sure, but I think consciousness only
exist in our little heads. How do you think? What is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
James Allison
James Allison Stefan Dorman . Consciousness is never divided but
instead it’s presence is everywhere right? Not limited by space or
time! Yet, paradoxically, is present at everywhere in space and time-
in every atom and throughout every galaxy!
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Stefan Dorman An act of observation “collapses” the wave
function of potentialities. In other words, our “intention” to
perceive something changes what exists as probabilities, generating
the reality that we then perceive!
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I think consciousness is primary. It exists outside of
time and space. It is everywhere at every scale. It is the sea of
potential we call the aether.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes non local consciousness. There are numerous
evidences for this. My favorite is remote viewing but other studies
like the recent one at Harvard say the same thing. There is no such
thing as local realism.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is An act of observation “collapses” the wave function
of potentialities? What is sea of potential? What is aether made of?
What is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside of the Body & After Death
CONSCIOUSLIFESTYLEMAG.COM
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside…
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside of the Body & After Death
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Fake news. All BS. Similar lie to LIGO detected gravity waves.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No because I personally have had such experiences Joe...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Me two. I smoked salvia, went to a place/heaven and
discovered we are all immortal souls, this life time is but a dream.
But that place is in fact within my head. If consciousness exist, it
must coexist with matter and energy. Empty space has nothing at all.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Even the space around us is 99.9% empty empty space/vacuum.
It is fact.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Smoking salvia is not the same as an out of body
experience. I've done plenty of drugs I know the difference. Beyond
that it can be demonstrated experimentally that it is possible for
remote viewers to see not just other points in space but other moments
in time past/future as well.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I doubt. What is the mechanism? The whole existence of the
whole universe is only at this moment called now. Past and future only
exist in our heads. Time travel is impossible science lie. Simple
fact, cus time is universal, time is not a physical place that can be
visiting/treaveling.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No non-locality is already proven. Think of time like a
wake. Even though the wave only exists at one point at a time the
water that makes the wave both pre and post exists irregardless of the
wave. We are in the wake or the 3D now. But for that wake t……查看更多
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I would also say it's not just past and future that only
exists in our consciousness... everything only exists in our
consciousness.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Scientists say the stars we see are mostly from billions of
years ago. This total lie or mistaken. All stars we see is existing
with us right now, all of them, even those too far away that we cannot
see. Because the whole existence only exist at this moment forever
ongoing now. This simple fact/truth should wake up call for all
people.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Ride the wake brother
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No BS wave for me.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Waves must have wave carrier.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman You seem very stuck on the physical. We are spiritual
beings having a physical experience not physical beings having a
spiritual experience.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes waves must have wave carrier.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am looking forward to learn spiritual knowledge, I think
all physical nature mechanism is already understood.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Then embrace what is there that you cannot see with your eyes.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You should check out my short book. I spent all my life to
search the mechanism of gravity, magnetic force, light,,,,,I found
them all. https://sciencere-volution.
編輯或刪除
Science Revolution
SCIENCERE-VOLUTION.BLOGSPOT.
Science Revolution
Science Revolution
1
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Such as what I cannot see? Field? Force? I can
feel force, but cannot feel field. Can you?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I'll look but you dismiss the aether and believe in
empty space soo honestly what you say does not resonate with me at
all.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Can you see of touch consciousness? Can you see or touch
thoughts or ideas? Can you see or touch the aether?
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is aether? How it works? What is in empty space? I
think we can discuss with open minds.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman It works as a fluid as long as you account for Lorentz
transformations.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman There is no empty space
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman This is why when you trap sound in a fluid it mimics
quantum mechanics and quantum wave function.
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman consciousness is little current in our brain
cells. How aether works as a fluid? What mechanism?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The space between air molecules is empty space, fact or not?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is quantum wave function? Play word puzzle again?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is quantum? Forgot Einstein said quantum is BS?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Tell you truth, by now if you say earth is flat, I won't
argue with you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman The Earth is a flat torus which is topologically
identical to the globe...
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Also the preferred frame of reference for the universe.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Yer sir.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Please teach me more.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Fell asleep.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman The universe appears flat to us in 3D but the actual
shape is determined by the critical density. The critical density of
the universe dictates a closed (spherical or toroidal) universe, and
the CMB best matches math for a flat 3torus universe. A flat 3torus
universe is a universe that looks flat but is actually a hypertorus,
that means if you travel in a straight line you will return to your
original reference frame. In a 3torus universe the twin paradox can
only be resolved with a preferred frame of reference since the twin
accelerating away from Earth will return to Earth without changing
direction. A preferred frame of reference is a location that all
motion, time and scale in the universe are measured against. The CMB
anisotropy data indicates that universal temperature fluctuations and
harmonic oscillations are relative to Earth's "rotation" with the
whole universe neatly divided into northern and southern hemispheres
relative to the elliptical plane of the Earth sun system (flat). Why
do you think someone like Lawrence Krauss would say this implies we
really are at the center of the universe? This is because it really
does imply Earth is this preferred frame of reference and is the
motionless center of the universe. Furthermore the transformation of
the universe from flat to hypertoroidal against Earth as a preferred
frame of reference implies that the Earth is a boundry surface of the
hypertorus itself and by definition also a flat 3torus. This is
convenient since Earth meets the requirements for a flat torus, it has
a smooth fractal surface and is embedded in a higher dimensional
construct. Since the flat torus and 3-sphere are homeomorphic you
essentially end up with Earth as an embedded horizontal coordinate
system. This means it is linear in 3D yet still topologically
identical to the globe.
Sources included.
Critical density of the universe.
https://gsjournal.net/....../
Why critical density determines the actual geometry.
https://www.space.com/34928-
Twin paradox in compact space.
http://cds.cern.ch/record/
Anisotropic dark flow acceleration and the Allais effect.
http://www.scirp.org/journal/
Lawrence Krauss quote.
https://www.goodreads.com/....
The 3-torus universe
https://www.nature.com/....../
Requirements of a flat torus.
http://www.science4all.org/
Why the flat torus and 3-sphere are topologically identical.
http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/.....
Why Earth can't be a 2-sphere.
https://m.phys.org/....../
Earth has a fractal surface.
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/
Horizontal coordinate system.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All BS.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman All experimental evidence for this. Look familiar?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/
隱藏或檢舉此留言
Horizontal coordinate system - Wikipedia
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
Horizontal coordinate system - Wikipedia
Horizontal coordinate system - Wikipedia
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman That coordinate system by the way is one of the most
used by astronomers so you know it represents the sky accurately.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Astronomers think light traveling in space at light speed
are all mistaken, stupid and foolish. This is a fact. Because light
don't travel in space, light only coexist with matter.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Light doesn't have a speed really more like a rate of
induction. A rate determined by the permittivity and permeability of
the medium. That was experimentally demonstrated by Morton Spears.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All theories based on light speed in space is 3 x 10^8 m/s
are false theories. Simple facts. Agreed now?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But you are correct light cannot travel in nothing
because waves need a carrier and a photon is only a magneto-dielectric
pulse. That medium however is the aether and it is everywhere.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes light does not have the same speed in space because
of vacuum permittivity.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman BS. Aether is imaginary.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Just my understanding.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Aether medium subject to Lorentz transformation relative
to Earth as a preferred frame of reference = unified theory of
physics.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
隱藏31則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang aether is imaginary just like photon and graviton and black
hole. All scientists lies. What is the content of aether? What is
aether?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I have already told you it is a non-physical medium
consisting of quantum fluctuations which adheres to fluid dynamics+
Lorentz transformations.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman BS. What is quantum? What is non-physical
medium? You think science is word puzzle or monkey story? Quantum
fluctuations? What is quantum vacuum virtual plasma (NASA's mechanism
for their so called EM drive)?
Science is controlled religi……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman You're repeating yourself Joe and I've already and your questions.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Literally that is copy and paste of the response you
have yesterday that I already answered.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You answered BS. What is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman What is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang See if any scientists can answer that simple question? Neil?
Greener? Mechio Kaku? Go ask them, see how they fart this time?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman They are puppets. Either way I answered your questions yesterday.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman I didn't see it. Can you please tell me again,
what is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you copy and paste yesterday's answer? Please.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Quantum just means a measurement of all things smaller
then the sub atomic scale.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman So what is quantum computer? What is quantum
gravity? What is quantum field?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman What are quantum fluctuations?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Joe Chang The aether is space. Space is the posterior
attribute of the loss of inertia. There is only Force in
motion/inertia and acceleration. Everything is capacitance,
resistance, magnetic permeability and dielectric permittivity. Ken
basically wrote the book on Magnetism! He has published four volumes
on Rediscovering the lost Secrets of magnetism.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang James Allison That's Ken's BS. His magnetism is incorrect.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Space is just empty space. It has no properties. No forces,
fields, no photons, no EM waves, no energy, no aether, nothing at all.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang James Allison You read and believe and repeat. Without
knowing precise mechanism of any theories you repeat. This is not
correct way of science.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang People like you if hold positions in scientific field, will
make science worse.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Already a stinky swamp!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman How can consciousness exist in empty space if there is
nothing there?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.researchgate.net/.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
(PDF) Consciousness in the Universe is Scale Invariant and Implies an
Event Horizon of the Human Brain
RESEARCHGATE.NET
(PDF) Consciousness in the Universe is Scale Invariant and…
(PDF) Consciousness in the Universe is Scale Invariant and Implies an
Event Horizon of the Human Brain
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.nature.com/
隱藏或檢舉此留言
Challenging local realism with human choices
NATURE.COM
Challenging local realism with human choices
Challenging local realism with human choices
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Consciousness only exist in our heads. What makes you think
it exist in space?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Joe Chang I’m having an issue here on where exactly he
is incorrect? Given the basis he started with before publishing his
work and providing the experimental data he always does. Magnetism is
magnetism is magnetism. There is no such thing as magnetic ……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison No such thing as polarity as it is the inverse of counter space.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside of the Body & After Death
CONSCIOUSLIFESTYLEMAG.COM
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside…
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside of the Body & After Death
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang James Allison Theory Of Magnetism And Electromagnetic Induction
Ferromagnetic material has a special property – it can be magnetizing
to create temporary magnetic domains.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Joe Chang Electric arrows? You mean centrifugal
divergence and centripetal convergence? So a “bar” magnet would behave
similar to any other magnet whether it’s pyramid shaped, square shaped
or circular shaped. Since polarity is just the inverse of counter
space. Use a Ferro cell and observe the similarities. At least from
what I have observed, there is a Longitudinal plain of inertia in
every magnet.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I mean two next atoms become electrically polarized, 1 atom
positive, 1 atom negative. So called magnet moment.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Ken's word puzzles, such as counter space, centrifugal
divergence are just word puzzles. Imaginary stuff. No batter than
black holes, photons, quantum fields etc BS.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Burt Griswold
Burt Griswold You have them clutching their prayer beads, Joe. What is
the Big Bang if not a reified Creation Myth. It's all a big LARP. A
big, expensive LARP.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The big bang is big fart form some stupid scientists. Are
energy and matter conserved? Yes or no? If yes is correct, the big
bang will be impossible. Do you agree? Why?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Burt Griswold
Burt Griswold In general I try not to have opinions about things I
can't verify. Like the creation of the Cosmos. Evidence would appear
to be weighted on the side of the conservation of energy, though.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang That's fair and rational thinking.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Tim Davies
Tim Davies It does slow down , depends on permitivity of the material
etc. Cus only 300000 km sec in a vacuum
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Light speed in vacuum is infinite. 100% correct.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Tyler Schwarzkopf
Tyler Schwarzkopf Physics and religion need to be separate. Word
definition is what the dissidents lack.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Matt Cohen
Matt Cohen Study thermodynamics and temperature and how it can be calculated...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joey Zuppardo
Joey Zuppardo The scientific method assures that other people can
replicate the experiments. If they come up with something this
disproves yours, then you see how and why and learn to accept it as
truth.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Agree. Can you do the following? Two Easiest Ways To Win the
Nobel Prize
1. Prove light must coexist with matter, and there is no light wave in
the vacuum of space.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Joe Chang Light is a coaxial circuit of transverse
electrical and magnetic and Longitudinal rarefactions and
compressions. The illumination of light is the dielectric pulse
perturbations created from the rarefactions and compressions via
magnetic and electric fields/energies.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Still Ken's BS. Light is alternating current atoms carried.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang James Allison Go ask Ken what carried E and M force/field in
vacuum space? Aether?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Cue the dudes above saying they “know” the
answers. Ask better questions before you say someone’s answers of the
past are still correct.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Geoffrey Harford
Geoffrey Harford https://l.facebook.com/l.php..
隱藏或檢舉此留言
EINSTEIN and EMPTINESS
THELETHALTEXT.ME
EINSTEIN and EMPTINESS
EINSTEIN and EMPTINESS
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Richard van Amelsfort
Richard van Amelsfort The way I see photons is they behave like
electrons they are everywhere so are photons they don't move much at
all they move then impart their momentum to the next photon untill
they reach our eye so we move through electrons every where so are
photons they even exist in darkness
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang what is photon made of? How photons carry momentum? If
photons have momentum, why Navy laser that can shut down air plan
cannot move a flame? Why light mills don't spin in hard vacuum?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Matthew Donahue
Matthew Donahue Your arguments are trash.illogical trash.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Will Weimer
Will Weimer Science is indeed an exercise in faith
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Please stop repeating a quote from Einstein just
before he died, in 1955. So what? The photoelectric effect is real.
Einstein somewhat got the fame for other's work but again - but so
what? If you cannot accept the photo electric effect, known for
many……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
隱藏33則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The photoelectric effect is BS. If photons have momentum,
why laser beam cannot move a flame? Why light mills don't spin in a
hard vacuum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang So what is quantum computer, quantum energy, quantum state,
quantum field?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Well? No more BS?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - you are stubborn. The photo electric
effect is driven by particular wavelengths for the material. If
someone calls that wavelength a photon, the photoelectric effect is
still real. A wavelength has a related energy; that allows someone to
say the energy of a photon rather than energy of a wavelength. The
selection of words does not define whether the effect is real. It is.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Word salad. If photons have momentum, why laser beam cannot
move a flame? Why cook's radiometer don't spin in hard vacuum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang google and wiki don't have the answer. go ask tyson etc top
guys. see how they fart.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang you sound like a truth seeker and wise guy.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang ask them how 1 electron and 1 proton can form a stable
hydrogen atom? what is precise mechanism?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You want truth, go find out it!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang it is BS to quibble about the use of the
word photon. It appears you also want to discuss all the uses of the
word quantum. I now have no idea where you are trying to take EUT. Do
you want EUT to discuss the terms used when discussing subatomic
particles like the word quark? Can you briefly state your goal for
this post?
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang to find out truth, what else?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang you?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang anyone talks about photon, think it is real particle is a
liar or retard after reading all the comments I made.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang I pointed out the photoelectric effect is
truth but you deny it. I learned the similarities between the
photoelectric effect and an absorption line but you deny the effect.
That denial is not consistent with your goal.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You denial the fact that photons don't have momentum,
otherwise why don't you answer the questions? Science is controlled
religion. No matter how much evidence, the
shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes. For
example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the
godfather of quantum concept said:
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer
to the answer to the question, “What are light quanta?” Nowadays every
Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -
Einstein 1955
Now every scientist photon this, photon that, quantum everything, all
BS. Do you understand?
Neil? How photon can pass through water at same speed without slowing
down like a real particle? How photons can accelerate into air? What
is the mechanism? Magic?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Well, internet down?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Take your time, show me the truth.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - my internet is fine. I see no point in
discussing the use of the word photon. I pointed out we could use the
word wavelength but you persist in seeing a problem with photon...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang I expect EUT is fine with freely mixing
photon or wavelength. If photon is not acceptable then this might be
the wrong group for your problem with that word, photon.
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang David Michalets Wavelength carries momentum? How?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How wavelength knock out electrons from solar cells? What is
precise mechanism?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison David Michalets But the word selection is one of the
most important factors pertaining to science and especially physics.
Punctuation is equally important as any other factor in physics.
Rather. The proper Nomenclature is what separates the smart
individuals from the less smart ones! Any scientist or physicist with
a PHD or masters in their field should know this more than any other
person! Instead. They use numbers to try and describe pressure
mediations and field perturbations!
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How wavelength travels in space at light speed?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Internet down again?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I wish all top scientists are in here with us!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Newton might lo his ass.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Einstein swollowed his dental.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets James Allison - you are correct. Since the
photoelectric effect involves the ejection of an electron the QM term
photon is usually appropriate. It is not 'required.' In this comment
stream there are references to 'light' and to photons. Maybe I am just
too tolerant to accept different terms when I know they are the same
thing.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Yes sir.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How the same thing carries momentum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison David Michalets I’m just saying. Does make a difference
when explaining all this to another individual. It was hammered into
my head by my physics and astronomy teacher lol.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets James Allison - I agree but...my personal problem is I
never had QM in my EE so photon was almost never used; Changing
electron shells did not require a photon, just a particular energy
that could be a wavelength.I learned QM later so it is a 2nd
lang……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison David Michalets You are so right in that aspect there. I
can totally relate. The main issue here isn’t really just the issue
with terminology. It’s the fact that the mainstream cannot swallow
what is the truth even when experimental data and observatio……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Clay Taylor
Clay Taylor Joe Chang, it's actually you who needs to describe what
quantum is, if you say it's bs. It just sounds to me like you don't
even understand the original purpose of the word. By its definition:
-A discrete quantity of energy proportional in magnitude to the
frequency of the radiation it represents.
-An analogous discrete amount of any other physical quantity, such as
momentum or electric charge.
These FACTS of atomic interactions need to be explained by any model.
In your model, why does matter interact in discrete quantity
exchanges? And how do these quantities span a distance?
Also, your use of the electrostatic force, which I agree with,
satisfies a property you are arguing doesn't exist! You say there are
no waves in space, yet you admit to electrostatic waves. You say there
are no fields in space, yet you admit electrostatics connects all
matter. You say there is no aether, yet you miss out on the fact that
many scientists argue the electrostatic field IS the "aether." You are
basically arguing against yourself...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Einstein said quanta is BS. I am just agree with him.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang electrostatic waves are within matter/medium. Electrostatic
connected all matters not field connected them. Many scientists are
BSters.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
檢視另18則回覆
David Michalets
David Michalets Light has its own formula for its energy
The energy in light, in Joules is from this:……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
隱藏11則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is angular momentum of light? How matter is converted
in time? Are you just read and copy and repeat any BS without knowing
the mechanism and fact?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - now this is almost funny. I pointed out
the angular momentum of light comes from its electromagnetic fields
(which is the widely accepted fact - or BS in your view) while you
have proposed light is an alternating current without explaining how
that new mechanism works for electrons changing directions without a
defined electrical circuit. I suppose this is stalemate.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How electromagnetic fields carry momentum? What is the mechanism?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang David Michalets My bad. I should explain all science must
based on a correct atomic structure theory, because atoms are the
building blocks of the universe.
Atomic Structure Theory……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Open your minds, pretend you read this from newest textbook
that accepted by Einstein and Newton and Fanyman and Tyson.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang In my dream, they all cried for the joy to kiss my shoe.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Nowadays, the weed is awesome!
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Am I funnier than Ken Wheeler?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I also don't have tattos.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Please don't swallow your dental.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Clay Taylor
Clay Taylor
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Pirow John Rabe
Pirow John Rabe .
......the science (talk to get the job) of BS is NOT gonna last for
long...... supreme knowledge is to occur to everyone on earth
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson The seeming slowing down and speeding up is based on the
interaction of em waves generated by the excited electrons, that then
interact with the incoming light. This interference causes the seeming
change.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
隱藏17則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Where is exited electrons in vacuum space? How electrons get
existed? How em waves are generated? What incoming light from where?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Run out of air?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No friends, scientists and experts can help you out?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No google and wiki can copy and paste?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Eat more peas!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You can get even by asking Tyson or Kaku or greener the same
questions, 300% return rate.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Be brave, find out how they fart, come back and show to us.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Alexander Perinich
Alexander Perinich yeah today it takes three men to pull the wool over
the eyes, as opposed to just the one in Sagan's day
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson Alexander Perinich what is this in reference to?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson Joe Chang electrons inside the material.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Alexander Perinich
Alexander Perinich The fact that today it takes three men (Neil
DeGrassi High, Michio Kacked Himself and Brian Greene-mind) to create
the same propaganda pop science as it did just one in Carl Sagan's
day.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson The light wave passes through the material.
Some of the energy is given to the electrons in that material. The
pertubing of electrons causes an emission of em waves, this emission
(of the material) interferes with the light travelling through the
material, which causes a change in frequency, and wavelength
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson Alexander Perinich I have no idea what you mean by
propaganda, can you elaborate
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Alexander Perinich
Alexander Perinich I feel like the circular logic is even coming full
circle now.
No man, I was being fatuous/sarcastic. Its not funny if you have to
explain it, let alone twice
3
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Alexander Perinich
Alexander Perinich let's hope for some higher-end banter than this
repeated circle jerk that's been happening here lately.....
*unfolllows post*
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Calling names now? Showed your true color.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Ash Johnson How about the light wave/particle traveling in
space at light speed? What electrons is in space? What carries light
waves in the space? What energy? What angular momentum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Rafal Majak
Rafal Majak Science alone cannot anserw any question about values.
It's a tool. And when your only tool is a hammer all your problems
resemble nails
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Science is controlled religion. No matter how much evidence,
the shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes.
For example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the
godfather of quantum concept said:
All these fifty ye……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Vero Kasisto
Vero Kasisto Science is no such thing. Academic authority is a
globalist dominated corporatized and militarized system.
Science is a tool. The tool is not science.
We need to coherently identify globalists, across nations and
cultures, as spiteful middlemen who serve no purpose other then their
own.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman 235 comments. Joe is onto something. However the
moon landings were real. How did they find all those amazing samples
that actually help our EUT?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
隱藏32則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Internet down again?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang what?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Watch Apollo videos. They must land on the moon at morning
time to avoid high heat. Why many shadows are right under the objects
as if they took the videos at noon time?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang that can’t be your only evidence. WATCH APOLLO 15
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I see a cardboard made dog house on the fake moon.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Waht do you see?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman You have not watched it. Your evidence is lacking
and has been “debunked” already.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How to debunk short shadows?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang easy. You will become worthless very
quickly with your made up conclusions out of thin air. WATCH THE
VIDEOS. 16 is particularly interesting.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did you see those short shadows in 16? How do you explain?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman you’re caught up in the wrong premise.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Just before they take off from the moon, did you see all
shadows are VERY short? What happened? The Sun suddenly come over
their heads?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am so glad that you are helping me to show others how moon
landing is faked.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman You have only one premise and that has been proven
wrong a few times. You’re moving into crazy town really fast.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Yes sir
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Do you think LIGO lied about detected gravity wave?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang lunar surveys in 2009 have lots of
evidence. You can use a telescope and see for yourself the reflectors
left behind.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How they explain away the short shadows?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang lens flare?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 1.38 to 1.56 what happened? ISS turning 90 degrees in few
seconds? Or ISS is fake? https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
ISS Hair V Zero-G Airplane Hair. Fake Space.
YOUTUBE.COM
ISS Hair V Zero-G Airplane Hair. Fake Space.
ISS Hair V Zero-G Airplane Hair. Fake Space.
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang it’s called micro gravity. Not “weightless”.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang After you watched those, if you still think moon landing and
ISS are real, all I can say to you is, opinion various, all is good.
Have a great day!
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Matthew Scheffelman what happened? why she floats up?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天 · 已編輯
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman there is a difference between good and bad, your
ideas about our universe are great but your conspiracy theories about
the inventions and progress we have made are wrong. Voyager is still
flying.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Yes sir.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Still read fake news and believe?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang And come to repeat to show off?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Your teacher was good
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang tThat's how they got their job.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The Standard Model
Before we understand atoms, how can we learn about the universe? If
the standard model is wrong, then fundamental science will be wrong.
The standard model is recognized by nearly all particle physicists as
wrong in the sense that it is incomplete and only correct in a
phenomenological sense.
When scientists give up and call things the strong force, weak force,
up, down, bottom, top, strange and charming, it says it all.
Scientists think 1 electron and 1 proton are able to form a hydrogen
atom. That is impossible.
The 2 particles attract each other with the strongest attraction force
in nature F=Ke x pe/R^2. The attraction force between an electron and
proton is 10^33 times stronger than 2 neodymium magnets. What force
can separate a proton and an electron?
Therefore, they must stick together under that force. The electron is
impossible to orbit, or become a wave or cloud around the proton to
form a stable atom.
Scientists invented a force called the strong force, which holds
protons together. They forgot to invent another force that keeps
electron away from proton, so atoms are able to form. Why do protons
stick together, but an electron and a proton don't stick together?
They invented the uncertainty principle, wave-particle duality, wave
function collapse, electron shell, orbital, quantum state, energy
level, electron-hole, and the electron cloud. These are all imaginary
made up word puzzles that have nothing to do with reality.
The standard model is like a monkey story.
It is so sad. You’ve got to follow that story to get a degree. You’ve
got to teach that story to become a teacher.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Internet down again?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang meidacom is good, 99.9999 up time.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio what is a graviton?
dr. franklin hall, i presume.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
隱藏46則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Those are top professors proudly, on youtube spreading lies,
can you spot it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
YOUTUBE.COM
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If you can't even tell such simple lie, what science lies
can you tell? I don't blame you read and believe. But I hope to open
your eyes/minds. My own family are just like you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang My brothers think I am crazy, want to send me to hospital.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang After read my book and book review.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I sold few books, only had 1 review.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang They think the review is fake. https://www.amazon.com/dp/
編輯或刪除
Science Revolution: Ten New Theories In Physics and Two Ways To Win
The Nobel Prize
AMAZON.COM
Science Revolution: Ten New Theories In Physics and Two…
Science Revolution: Ten New Theories In Physics and Two Ways To Win
The Nobel Prize
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Free book https://sciencere-volution.
編輯或刪除
Science Revolution
SCIENCERE-VOLUTION.BLOGSPOT.
Science Revolution
Science Revolution
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I wrote to 500 top physics professors around the world, from
MIT to university of Japan. Told them to do experiments to prove
present theory of light is incorrect. NO ONE reply. Why? ……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 500, no 1 reply. WHY? WHY? WHY?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - I must be closed minded like the 500.
Part of the preface has:
'……查看更多
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang the 500 didn't read my book, just a letter suggest them do
the light experiment.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you debunk anything in my book?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you spot what's wrong with those two professors math in
the above video?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - as I said above unless accepted physics is
recognized even if only in the preface I expect turning the page is a
waste of time. Science is an accumulation of knowledge and it requires
a substantial leap to ignore all that has been learned the past. You
should reconsider your foundation to discard all that.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang OK. Can you answer my last two questions?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Anyone else can answer?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio Joe Chang about the video... i don't really
understand why he shifts the second series of one digit when he adds
s2+s2.
2s2 should be 2-4+6-8+10-12+14...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Thanks. Just look at the equation, 3 simple mistakes right
there. 1. The left side is a positive number, the right side is a
negative number. 2. The left side is infinitely large number, the
right side is less than zero. 3. Left for you to spot.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Now can you spot what's wrong with E=MC^2?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why did you insist E=MC^2 is fact?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Are you stupid?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why did you teach that in the class?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio well my brother thinks i'm crazy too but he's
probably right 'cause my mom never gave birth to a second child.
thanks for the link anyway.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Should those lying professors fired?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Those are everywhere in top universities. Do you understand?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio Joe Chang the vampire hunter told dracula: "you
steal men's souls, and make them your slaves!"
and dracula replied: "perhaps the same could be said of all religions".
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you tell right or wrong? Good or bad?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang am I talking to shadow people?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio Joe Chang right=good=1 truth=1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Who wants truth? Who cares truth? What is truth?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio Joe Chang nobody wants truth when it brings
uncomfortable consequences. we are creatures of habit.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What truth brings you uncomfortable consequences?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Fake moon landing? Fake ISS? Lying LIGO? Lying professors?
What truth makes you uncomfortable?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Are you feeling bad for been cheated?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why don't you thank me to wake you up?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why don't you go around to wake your other brothers up?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why you want to jerk off?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I rather to be a butterfly next life.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang my heart is bleeding
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang can you paypal me 5?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Any amount is good!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang People are mean,,,,
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Theory Of Matter And Energy
Energy is the motive force carried by moving matter (kinetic energy)
and the alternating current carried in atoms (thermal energy).
An atom is formed from charged particles, therefore energy in the atom
is electric energy.
The matter is formed from atoms, therefore energy in matter is electric energy.
The universe is formed from matters, therefore all of the energy in
the universe is electric energy.
Since charged particles are indestructible, therefore an atom is
indestructible, therefore the matter is conserved.
Since energy coexists with matter, energy is conserved.
All matters are constantly vibrating, moving, acting, changing,
reforming, and evolving.
All the energy comes from atom formation.
When oppositely charged particles attract each other to form an atom,
their potential energy transfers into kinetic energy and is stored
within the atom in the form of alternating current between the
positively charged nucleus and the negatively charged atom ball. This
inherited current is oscillating at radius direction.
Energy can move from matter to matter, but energy cannot transform
into the matter, and energy cannot vanish into the vacuum.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can Newton and Einstein write this theory? Do you like this
theory? Can you accept it? Why?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If this theory is correct, then the big bang is impossible,
the stars are not fusion reactors. Do you agree? Why?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Light travels in air at light speed, in vacuum at infinite
speed. Light don't travel, light induces light over any distance
instantly.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Are they all fake people? All controlled? I really have no
clue. Strangest thing in my life.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I wrote to nobel and breakthrough prize, they never reply either.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang NASA, phy.org, reddit, all science forums, facebook
ifreakinglovescience 18 million people page, all banned my IP. Why?
編輯或刪除
Phy.org - Science: Physics
PHY.ORG
Phy.org - Science: Physics
Phy.org - Science: Physics
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No place will accept my paper, theory and publish it to the
public. Why?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am so lucky to be able to post here!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer please do 10 more posts as quickly as you can, i'm
jerkin off on it realtime. jeez.
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Donahue
Matthew Donahue me too!shh!
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jörg Kirchhof
Jörg Kirchhof Omg I don't want to know your sexual activities lol
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jana Dixon
Jana Dixon Borg Science is a religion.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 27 fake people thumbs up for this post?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Photons do slow down when passing through differing materials...
Literally that is how optical refraction occurs.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
隱藏13則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why light travels in water at 3/4 C speed but accelerate
into air at C speed?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Air's refractive index is about 1.0003, while water's is
about 1.3. This means that light is “slower” in water than air. This
is because it's more likely to hit a molecule and then get re-emitted,
lengthening the amount of time the light takes to get through a
certain distance of the medium.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson This , of course, is also based on frequency of the
light, as some light will refract more due to wavelength.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How about light in vacuum space there is no air molecule?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Then it is at near full speed ( but nothing is devoid of
everything :P )
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson The speed is just "C"... But there are talks about what
makes it that speed... Perhaps the interstellar and intergalactic
medium has different speeds because of the nature of the construction
of the universe.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang A simple way to understand the universe, remember this.
For any matters M1 and M2 at distance R, there are two fundamental
forces constantly at work.
1. Universal attraction force/gravity F=G x M1M2/R^2.
2. Universal repulsion force/levity F=Ke x Q1Q2/R^2. Q1 is the total
charge of line of sight electrons on the surface of M1, Q2 is the
total charge of line of sight electrons on the surface of M2.
These two forces rule the universe. Respond for star formation, stable
orbit, light, radiation, induction, quantum entanglement, all nature
phenomena.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson You do know you are speaking to me right?
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I know you are confused about light.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Well, we use these to calculate the power of
photo-voltaic solar cells and I am and engineer specializing in
them... So....
Not sure what part you would want to disagree with there...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Sunlight is high frequency alternating current in the air.
When the current reaches solar cells, produces DC current. There is no
photon hitting electron out to produce DC current.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Joe Chang Not really. The movement of AC is
longitudinal, whereas EMF is transverse.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 13小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Light is longitudinal. EMF is longitudinal.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 12小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Space does not curve... That would be kinda silly.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Space does not expend, that's another science lie.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 11小時
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Things are all Quantum today... Back in the 60's they
were Photons...
Buzzwords man.
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 60's they said fusion will be reality in 30 years.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson They also said Subspace and Warp drive... which will never happen.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Few years ago NASA talk about solar sails and EM Drive. All BS out.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Now they took pic of black hole, might build super detector
in space to scam more $.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang LIGO got more fund already.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang We sheeple can only rant on facebook a little.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Edgars Behmanis
Edgars Behmanis Actually it is - literaly, first scientists were
chatolic monks all basis we are operating today is made by them.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Magnetic force is circular electric force. Magnetic field is
circular electric field. Simple facts. Magnetic field of the earth is
within atmosphere. There is no magnetic field out side of earth
atmosphere.
All those concentric rings/lines are electric force lines. They are
parallel electric force rings induced by the magnets.
Ken, why you deleted my comment? https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The red spot is denser iron deposit induced by the pole.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Eric, Tyson, Kaku, Greener etc never reply my question and
post on their facebook pages, deleted most posts. Why? What is going
on? You guys don't reply, why?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Are you all bots?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Quite happy bots?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer i'm not a bot, its just that youre being nuts again.
didnt i mention the same phenomenon yesterday? do you think spamming
10 posts in a row will bring you anywhere? where is that?
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Forgive me, just too existed, like an electron jumps energy
level, all BS.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Proton-electron attraction force is 10^33 times stronger
than super glue. How can electron jump away from it? Isn't present
theory of atom 100% BS? Open your minds, be fair to yourself.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer why would my mind be closed on this? why do you
accuse all of us here to being too stupid for your ideas? i havent
even thought about it...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer PLEASE REPLY HERE
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I didn't accuse anyone stupid. I even say yes sir to a few.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer yeah, you acted all friendly, for example upon
replying to my reply in a new main string comment
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer MARKED AS SPAM;
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I JOKE A LITTLE, seriously.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer MARKED AS SPAM
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Dude, come down.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If you discovered some science lies, will you share with
friends, show off in public? Me too. Appreciate the info, don't hate
the messenger.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Any science questions? Be happy to hear it?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
隱藏50則回覆
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman So you only believe in physical particles and emptiness
right? No fields?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Fields are coexist with matters. Empty space has no forces/
fields, no nothing at all. All forces are carried by charged particles
and matters.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang A simple way to understand the universe, remember this.
For any matters M1 and M2 at distance R, there are two fundamental
forces constantly at work.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman What propagates the fields and force?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Between the physical particles explain what carries
forces? If fields what is their medium? Do you think emptiness carries
waves?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Wave is a description of action through a medium. What
is the medium?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman How does something attract or repulse another something
through nothing? What is the exact mechanism?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Hold a magnet in each hand, with the same poles facing each
other. Do you feel the strong repulsion force? Yes.
Wave one hand in and out. Feel the kinetic energy instantly
transferred to the other hand? Yes.
Are the two hands waving at the same frequency? Yes.
Is there any magnetic wave traveling between the two hands? No.
The repulsion magnetic force is the conductor of kinetic energy
between the two hands, enabling kinetic energy to freely transfer
instantly. We can call this phenomenon magnetic radiation.
If we hold electrons in our hands instead of magnets, it is
electrostatic radiation, a misinterpretation of electromagnetic
radiation by scientists.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All atoms are holding electrons on the surfaces. Therefore
line of sight electrons on the surface of the plasma on the Sun and
electrons on the surface of earth outer atmosphere are repelling each
other with Coulomb's force F=Ke x e1e2/R^2, which is 10^33 stronger
than magnetic force. That force transfer light energy instantly
between any distance.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Science call light EM wave, electromagnetic radiation. In
fact, light is electrostatic radiation.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Get it now?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Thank you for the questions!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If you wave 1 hand in and out, the other hand will wave out
and in, this is radiation. If you wave 1 hand up and down, the other
hand will wave down and up, this is induction. All electrostatic, no
EM. Scientists are all messed up.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang There is no EM wave/transverse wave move in vacuum or
medium. Only electrostatic force/wave move in medium. No
light/wave/EMF travels in vacuum at light speed. All scientists are
wrong about light speed in vacuum space is C.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If I don't discover this, if you don't spread this, our
mistaken science of light will never change.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 500 top professors don't give a fuck. Ken, Tyson, Eric etc
no one gives a fuck. I am fighting alone for years. God is the only
one that helps me. So far.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I discovered antennas don't have current pass through it,
only carry changing voltage few months ago, while posting here.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am 68, last few weeks had 2 ER calls, any time could go
away. All my ideas are at
https://sciencere-volution.
it. Remember Tesla die alone? I might be him in this time frame. My
work has not been noticed yet.
編輯或刪除
Science Revolution
SCIENCERE-VOLUTION.BLOGSPOT.
Science Revolution
Science Revolution
1
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang My poetry for all the woman. http://cigvaporizer.com/asd.
編輯或刪除
a stranger's dream
CIGVAPORIZER.COM
a stranger's dream
a stranger's dream
1
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Tonight might be good time for me to fly away, thank you all.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman What carries the spherical wave oscillations?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Just particles? That's it? I'm seriously asking you? Do
you believe in non physical force carrying fields or do you only
believe is physical particles and empty space?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman The medium. Air/water/matter carries sound
waves and light/radio waves. Within the atoms, oscillating charged
particles/electron/enertron carries electrostatic waves/AC. Charged
particles are the building blocks of the universe. Flesh and soul,
matter and energy. Nothing else.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang That's why no light/em waves in space.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Gravity waves must coexist with matter. We detect earthquake
waves to measure its attitude.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But the mediums of air and water are not continuous.
What's between the particles carrying the waves.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman If no fields, what is charge?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Solid and liquid are continuous. Air is not.
But the repulsion force between air molecules carry the waves.
Remember universal repulsion force between any M1 and M2 at a
distance? F=Ke x e1e2/R^2.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Charge is electric force carried on/with charged fundamental
particles.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Remember the two magnets in your hands? That force
carry/transfer energy instantly.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Liquid is still not continuous the atoms are just closer
together. What carries force between M1 & M2? Gravity wave? What is
waving? Why do two electrons repel. What is the mechanism with no
medium between them? Is it all force through physical contact? What is
between the electron pieces you propose? Nothing?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Electric force? What force? What is carrying the force?
Only electrons bumping together?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Electrons carry negative charge. Same charges repel each
other with Coulomb's force F=Ke x e1e2/R^2. This is accurately
measured fundamental force in the labs. You can't see force but you
can feel it. such as magnetic force and gravity. If you hold same
changed matters, you can measure the repulsion force between them.
Seems you don't have any basic physics knowledge?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Liquids are not compressible, all atoms are connected.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No two atoms ever touch. Too much repulsive force
between electron shells.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman So what mechanism carries this non physical force we can
feel but not see?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is electron shells? Made from what? Why shells don't
attracted to protons?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did you study physics?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Stay on point. What is the mechanism of action to carry
force between two electrons. No I am a high school dropout who grows
cannabis and reads physics in my spare time.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I do not subscribe to sciencism but I also do not
believe you can have one physical body influence another physical body
with nothing in-between them and no physical contact between them.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman What makes up a field?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I told you there is no field but force. Did you/can you feel
the force between two magnets?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang if you want to learn the mechanism of nature or anything,
you must start from the basics. How's your physics at high school?
Understand the basics?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman BS. Empty space is a fart. There is no such thing as
nothing. If conscious observation and choice influence or dictate
local realism then reality is only a reflection of consciousness.
There can never be nothing because nothing cannot be aware of itself.
Nothing cannot store information.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang OK, maybe you are correct. I am tired. Later.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes I'm well past the basics and I've taught myself
well. Yes I feel the force Joe but I do not believe the magnet is
surrounded by electrons that are imparting physical force. No
electrons are measured in a magnetic field. The insanity of the
standard model assumes virtual photons are the force carriers. Do you
really believe it's just tiny electron pieces bouncing off of each
other and protons in empty space?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Rest well brother I hope you feel better and smoke some
good medicine.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Move a magnet over a copper wire, produces electric current
is fact. The mechanism is magnet carries circular electric force, when
magnet and wire have relative motion, the circular electric force in
the magnet induces electric force/current in the wire. So called
magnetic force is in fact circular electric force carried by magnet
moment in the magnet.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Oh yea, I smoke weed every day for 30 years. Best friends are growers.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I got all physical things figured out. Form atom structure
to star formation. My blog is worth your time and mind. Maybe some day
you will feel it is best weed you never smoked.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Those are top professors proudly, on youtube spreading lies,
can you spot it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
YOUTUBE.COM
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Read the comments. Can you see how confused the masses are?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Do you like to help them?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Do this first, best weapon for the war. Two Easiest Ways To
Win the Nobel Prize
1. Prove light must coexist with matter, and there is no light wave in
the vacuum of space.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Shifu R. Careaga
Shifu R. Careaga Problem is not that they slow down... Problem is how
they instantly speed up. Hence: not particles. Something more.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 12小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Good thinking. What is something more?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Shifu R. Careaga
Shifu R. Careaga Joe Chang something superceding particles and waves
and therefore can appear as both but isn't either in identity
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How about something is alternating current?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Shifu R. Careaga
Shifu R. Careaga Joe Chang quite likely. Cycling is almost assured
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Cool. Theory Of Light
Light travels in air at light speed, in vacuum at infinite speed.
Light don't travel, light induces light over any distance instantly.
Light is visible alternating current.
Lightwaves must exist within matter.
Lightwaves are longitudinal waves.
Light is not a photon particle.
Light cannot become matter.
Light is the universe's free electricity.
Sunlight stays in Sun's plasma.
Sunlight on earth stays in Sun facing atmosphere.
How does sunlight travel through space to reach us?
Sunlight stays within the plasma on the Sun; sunlight does not travel in space.
Sunlight transfers its energy to earth instantly through an invisible
giant rigid rod.
One end of the rod sets on the Sun's plasma and covers half of the
Sun, while one end sets on earth's atmosphere and covers half of the
earth.
That rod is made of the repulsion force between the line of sight
electrons on the surface of the
Sun's plasma and on the surface of the earth's outer atmosphere. F=Ke
x e1e2/R^2.
That rod of force is, in fact, billions of times stronger than a steel
rod; it locks the atoms touched on both ends as one, conducts
electrical resonance between the Sun and the earth, and keeps
alternating current on the Sun and on earth oscillating at the same
frequency.
The same rod of repulsion force connected all the stars, moons,
planets and every mass in the universe altogether, just like gravity
connected them all together. Gravity pulls all matters together, while
repulsion force pushes all matter apart.
Coulomb discovered repulsion force and attraction forces are like the
hands of God. God holds the universe with his left hand and plays a
love song with his right hand
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Earth magnetic force/field is very weak, cannot even deflect
lightning direction. How can it deflect high speed moving charged
particles?
How can it protect earth from Sun's radiation or so called/fake solar
wind?……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
David Michalets
David Michalets Please use the correct word - dogma -not religion.
This is a discussion about differing views of science. dogma is 'a set
of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.'
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang More common science lies - Van Allen Belts and solar wind
Sun's radiation can only coexist with matter/medium/air/water/glass.
There is no radiation in the vacuum space.
There is no Van Allen Belts. Because there is no radiation out side of
earth atmosphere. There is Sun's radiation on the surface of the moon,
but there is no radiation in the space between Sun and moon.
Radiation/light/EMF/Radiant energy must coexist with matter/medium.
There is no solar wind. What is the mechanism? How solar wind is
produced? How solar wind can escape from Sun's gravity? Why electrons
and protons in the solar wind don't form into hydrogen atoms? What is
solar wind temperature? Where are all the solar wind go? Isn't matter
conserved?
Scientists lied about gravity speed, light speed, black hole, dark
matter, big bang, gravity lensing, space expending, background
radiation. Detected gravity wave, took picture of black hole. moon
landing, space missions, solar sail, EM Drive.
I wonder what's next lie.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
隱藏21則回覆
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang- your selection of words is intended to
disturb the reader rather than enlighten. 'lie' implies the person is
intentionally saying something he knows is wrong. That is never the
case every time you use 'lie' but rather they are making a mist……查看更多
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Cool, opinion various, all is good.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang David Michalets Is this a lie or mistake?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
YOUTUBE.COM
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 9小時
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - a lie is NOT an opinion. 'lie' does not
apply to any of your posts.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you answer the question? Are those professors lied?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - it is neither, it is a joke! A game with
probabilities.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did LIGO lied detected gravity wave?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did NASA lied moon landing?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied took picture of black hole?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied gravity speed is light speed 3x10^8 m/s?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied stars are fusion reactors?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied Sun light takes 8 minutes to reach us?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied that transverse electric wave and
magnetic wave traveling in space at light speed?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied about gravity lensing that gravity can
bend light, in fact it is plasma on the Sun bend light?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied that 23 watts transmitter on Voyager can
sent picture from that far away, and the pictures gets more clear as
farther away?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did NASA lied about solar sails are working in space?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did NASA lied about EM Drive is working few years back?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you handle the truth?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - I find it fascinating you are stuck on
gravitational waves in the EUT site.
On August 20 I posted that every LIGO detection occurs near an earth
tide event. An earth tide is a slow moving wave in the crust as the
earth rotates with the moon overhead, just as an ocean tide is a slow
moving wave on the ocean.
The earth tide especially a new moon or full moon, apparently triggers
the LIGO system to check their data for a match and over the 19 earth
tide events LIGO has found 35 detections. In my view these events
trigger their analysis sequence. In my view there is no 'real' wave
detected. In their view their system is detecting what they are
looking for.That's why they got their award.
I am not the person to explain the confusion in LIGO. They are not
telling a lie. They believe it, so they are making a mistake.
Eventually we can hope to point out their mistakes but calling them
liars won't help.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang BS. Any rational thinker knows gravity is coexisting with
matters and must be instantaneous force, otherwise no planets can have
stable orbit. How can LIGO teams don't know that fact?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Like those lying professors don't know positive number
cannot equal to negative number?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman What about when the plasma crystalizes?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Plasma with high charge density and low temperature will
crystalize according to it's Coulomb interaction in microgravity.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang THC can crystalize. Plasma I doubt. Plasma only exist in
high temperature. You are full of it in physics, smoke your green,
read the basics, don't BS too much.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
隱藏58則回覆
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Plasma crystallization is experimentally demonstrated.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman "In this project we studied the lattice structure of
dusty plasma Coulomb
crystls formed in rectangular conductive grooves as a function of plasma
temperature and density. The crystal appears to be made of mutually
repulsive……查看更多
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I think it is fake data, another science lie.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman More likely to crystalize in microgravity. The "Van
Allen belts" are plasma with high charge density and low temperature
in microgravity...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What plasma in around earth? Plasma is on the Sun. There is
no plasma on earth or moon, no plasma in space.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Also yesterday you said liquid does not compress. So
what about superionic water?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Where is it? Did you tried it is not compressible? How?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Superionic water is also experimentally demonstrated.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All lies.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.researchgate.net/.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Don't quote anything, something original.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman "what plasma around Earth?"
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Not only is it plasma with high charge density and low
temperature in microgravity it is contained by a magnetic field.
https://m.phys.org/news/2015-
隱藏或檢舉此留言
Made to order: Researchers discover a new form of crystalline matter
PHYS.ORG
Made to order: Researchers discover a new form of…
Made to order: Researchers discover a new form of crystalline matter
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All BS. There is no high energy charged particles. There is
no plasma around earth or moon. Pasma only exist on the Sun.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman It also is mandatory once you understand gravity is
electrostatic capacitance potential. Dielectrophoresis requires
asymmetrical plates and by definition the smaller plate will have the
relatively negative charge. The voltage gradient potential between the
Earth and atmospheric boundry is an average of 100V/m
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Read and believe and copy and paste and show off. I read you
kind people like a book. Please stop it.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Dielectrophoresis you and I can demonstrate for
ourselves with a comb and a tap of water.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Morton Spears experimentally demonstrated that gravity
can be calculated as electrostatic capacitance potential. The force on
an asymmetrical capacitor is easy to demonstrate. The ice bucket
experiment is an easy way to demonstrate the E-field gradient coming
off of the Earth.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No need for books go try yourself.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Only believe what can be achieved at scale. Follow logic
before all else.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Go ahead to do the double slit experiment ia a vacuum glass
container. If you are serious. Don't show off your read knowledge,
everyone can read those. I don't want to argue or discuss science with
you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Before you do the experiment and report results.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But to say you believe the data on crystalline plasma is
being faked is a big stretch because many experiments have shown the
same results. You can find many different sources for such
information. I find it works better to dispute the interpretation
rather then the data.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman If I had access to such equipment I would love to do
such experiments Joe.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But through experiments I have seen my friends preform
if you put a laser straight through the one of the lens of a pair of
3D glasses you get the same diffraction pattern as the double slit
experiment. However if the laser approaches 90° perpendicular to he
lense the diffraction pattern becomes a circle.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman An experiment everyone can try
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman At this angle the diffraction pattern changes from a
horizontal linear pattern to a perfect circle.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I sent you some short videos.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Vacuum pump, large glass container. You have
laser pointer, camera, make a slits is eazy. someone in this group
said he is going to do it few weeks ago, I forgot his name. Wonder
what happened?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 6小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I watched both few times. I know lot more scientific BS.
Only the double slit in vacuum experiment can prove light must coexist
with matter, therefore present theory is wrong. When many people do
the same and post videos, the mainstream must accept the fact and
rewrite textbooks.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 6小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The best way to fight for truth that I can figure out.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 6小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman You cannot achieve a sufficient vacuum with any pump I
can afford brother.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Light must co-exist with matter but not potential.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Not true, AC man vacuum pump is good enough.
See those youtube channel like Cody's lab etc. Those pumps are good
enough to disappear light wave interfrences.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What potential?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You can ask high school or college labs to help you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang They got everything needed.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman The magneto-dielectric potential.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Well I have one of the one stage pumps and I think a
laser pointer I'll let you know if it makes the interference
disappear.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Awesome! We can change the history soon,
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No magneto-dielectric potential. Only electric force at
work. Gravity and magnetic force are all electrostatic force at
different arrangement or configuration.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Magnetic force is circular electric force carried by
circular magnetic domains. Gravity is net electrostatic force between
all charged particles in all matters.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Tonight when it's darker and you can see it better I'll
send you picture of the interference pattern in the "vacuum".
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman You mean there is still interference pattern
in the vacuum? Nothing changes?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang That is impossible. Cus nothing can wave in the vacuum space
to make wave pattern interference.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Waves must coexist with matter/medium/air/water/glass.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Well it's very faint especially since my laser is weak
and it's light out but I'd say yes it's still there. I will take a
video for you tonight.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes though waves can only exist in a medium. That's why
the aether is logically unavoidable.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Cool, thank you very much!
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Cool, thank you very much!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman You mean aether is in the vacuum container
that carried light wave?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Aether causes photoelectric effect?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang See 1.50, 6.03, 10.43, make sure you did it correct, have
enough distance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
$10 Double-slit Experiment Vs. $2500 Double-slit Experiment
YOUTUBE.COM
$10 Double-slit Experiment Vs. $2500 Double-slit Experiment
$10 Double-slit Experiment Vs. $2500 Double-slit Experiment
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Mine is much more low budget I did it like this
basically but in a small 6×8×4 vacuum chamber. Yes though the aether
is everywhere, even in a vacuum. It is the fluid "fabric" of
reality.https://youtu.be/
隱藏或檢舉此留言
How To Make Your Own Double Slit Experiment (Young's) - Easy At-Home Science
YOUTUBE.COM
How To Make Your Own Double Slit Experiment (Young's) -…
How To Make Your Own Double Slit Experiment (Young's) - Easy At-Home Science
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But my laser pointer is a bird shaped laser pointer cat toy lol.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman And my vacuum chamber is for purifying cannabis concentrates lol
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Still good enough to try it out.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Don;t shame your good stuff.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Michael McDuffey
Michael McDuffey These are the sort of conversations that I live for!!!
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Thank you sir, me too, me too.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Rob Blair
Rob Blair #naturalscience
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang https://www.quora.com/What....
編輯或刪除
What would happen if black holes pulled things via electromagnetic
force rather than gravity?
QUORA.COM
What would happen if black holes pulled things via electromagnetic…
What would happen if black holes pulled things via electromagnetic
force rather than gravity?
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang PhD from MIT? Stupid monkeys..
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang His internet is down.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang When 5% of the masses know those professor/PhD are monkeys,
our science edu will be much better.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If you read all 500 comments here, if you are not in the 5%,
you must be the rest %. God bless you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4小時
David Scott
David Scott Joe Chang so you admit there is a god
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang God is in my heart and head for sure. I am stupid so what?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang David Scott tell your lady leave me alone.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2小時
David Scott
David Scott Joe Chang that's why they got pain pills right
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am not her pills.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 ·
On 8/30/19, Science Revolution <oxivape@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joe Chang
> 話題高手 · 8月26日下午1:58 · tag新增主題
> Science is controlled religion. No matter how much evidence, the
> shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes. For
> example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the
> godfather of quantum concept said:
>
> All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer
> to the answer to the question, “What are light quanta?” Nowadays every
> Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -
> Einstein 1955
>
> Now every scientist photon ⋯⋯
> 更多
> 36James Allison、Keredine A Ghannoum和其他34人
> 525則留言
> 讚
> 留言
> 留言
> Peter Scott-Morgan
> Peter Scott-Morgan Are you drunk?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang I don't drink. You?
> 1
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Peter Scott-Morgan
> Peter Scott-Morgan Joe Chang no, but I don’t talk about farting with a
> load of monkeys...
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> 檢視另7則回覆
> Josh Rozenfeld
> Josh Rozenfeld I would suggest business, not religion.
> 4
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Jan Henrik Bauer
> Jan Henrik Bauer photon does!!!!!! slow down underwaterz. read again!
> 1
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Steve Schrader
> Steve Schrader there are no photons, therefore they cannot "slow down"
> 2
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Jan Henrik Bauer
> Jan Henrik Bauer the photon energy slows down.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> 檢視另5則回覆
> Shawn Edward
> Shawn Edward 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 bruuuuh. You needa stop smokin them fuckin
> dick hairs...
> 1
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones
> Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones Come on Joe Chang, need a link please.
> Get the truth out there. I understand your despise for mainstream, you
> are right but pass on the knowledge.....I am trying to get what you
> are saying....? I thought you might like this, your
> thoughts........https://www.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
> YOUTUBE.COM
> 💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
> 💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
> 4
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Ken's theory of magnetism is incorrect. Theory Of Magnetism
> And Electromagnetic Induction
> Ferromagnetic material has a special property – it can be magnetizing
> to create temporary magnetic domains.……查看更多
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Tyler Schwarzkopf
> Tyler Schwarzkopf Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones tattooed buddha 😂
> he’s a fun guy to listen to though I’ll give him that
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> 檢視另 1 則回覆
> Dan Hughes
> Dan Hughes Science is philosophical naturalism... science can never
> return an explanation that is not material because it is
> philosophically limited to material explanations only...
> 1
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天 · 已編輯
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Everything has a precise mechanism. Without it no theory is
> correct.
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Dan Hughes
> Dan Hughes Yep... that's the assumption of naturalism...
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 3天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Lights rate of induction changes due to the relative
> permittivity and permeability of the medium of induction.
> Experimentally demonstrated by Morton Spears.
> 1
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> 隱藏67則回覆
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Light is visible alternating current within
> atoms/medium/matter. No light travels in vacuum space, light must
> coexist with matter.
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Yes and?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang If light must coexist with matter, no light travels in
> vacuum space. How light from the Sun can light up earth and moon?
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Potential travels in a vacuum. It becomes light when it
> interacts with gross matter. Also space is not a vacuum as you think
> of because there is still vacuum energy density.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman It's not nothing. There is no such thing as empty space.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman You seem to have a problem with the non-physical. What
> is your response to the fact that non-local consciousness has been
> empirically and experimentally demonstrated?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Do you believe consciousness is a product of the
> physical world? Just random chemical reactions in a bag of meat?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Stefan Dorman What potential travels in a vacuum? What is
> precise mechanism? How it becomes light? What is vacuum energy?
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Stefan Dorman The air around us only take up 0.1% space,
> 99.9% space around us is vacuum. Do you agree?
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman No such thing as nothing. Even the 99.9% is full of energy.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang What exactly is energy? How empty space carry energy? Don't
> fart, tell the fact.
> 1
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Stefan Dorman It is important to realize that in physics
> today, we have no knowledge of what energy is. We do not have a
> picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is
> not that way. -Feynman
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Where isn't consciousness Joe?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman If consciousness is non-local it must be everywhere
> right? Even in a vacuum.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Stefan Dorman I am not sure, but I think consciousness only
> exist in our little heads. How do you think? What is quantum?
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> James Allison
> James Allison Stefan Dorman . Consciousness is never divided but
> instead it’s presence is everywhere right? Not limited by space or
> time! Yet, paradoxically, is present at everywhere in space and time-
> in every atom and throughout every galaxy!
> 1
>
話題高手 · 8月26日下午1:58 · tag新增主題
Science is controlled religion. No matter how much evidence, the
shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes. For
example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the
godfather of quantum concept said:
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer
to the answer to the question, “What are light quanta?” Nowadays every
Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -
Einstein 1955
Now every scientist photon this, photon that, quantum everything, all
BS. Do you understand?
Neil? How photon can pass through water at same speed without slowing
down like a real particle? How photons can accelerate from water into air? What
is the mechanism? Magic?
How matter tells space how to curve? How space tells matter how to
move? Fart? Do you know when you are farting, many monkeys are farting
at the same time at many different places?
36James Allison、Keredine A Ghannoum和其他34人
525則留言
讚
留言
留言
Peter Scott-Morgan
Peter Scott-Morgan Are you drunk?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I don't drink. You?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Peter Scott-Morgan
Peter Scott-Morgan Joe Chang no, but I don’t talk about farting with a
load of monkeys...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
檢視另7則回覆
Josh Rozenfeld
Josh Rozenfeld I would suggest business, not religion.
4
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer photon does!!!!!! slow down underwaterz. read again!
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Steve Schrader
Steve Schrader there are no photons, therefore they cannot "slow down"
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer the photon energy slows down.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
檢視另5則回覆
Shawn Edward
Shawn Edward 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 bruuuuh. You needa stop smokin them fuckin
dick hairs...
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones
Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones Come on Joe Chang, need a link please.
Get the truth out there. I understand your despise for mainstream, you
are right but pass on the knowledge.....I am trying to get what you
are saying....? I thought you might like this, your
thoughts........https://www.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
YOUTUBE.COM
💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
4
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Ken's theory of magnetism is incorrect. Theory Of Magnetism
And Electromagnetic Induction
Ferromagnetic material has a special property – it can be magnetizing
to create temporary magnetic domains.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Tyler Schwarzkopf
Tyler Schwarzkopf Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones tattooed buddha 😂
he’s a fun guy to listen to though I’ll give him that
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
檢視另 1 則回覆
Dan Hughes
Dan Hughes Science is philosophical naturalism... science can never
return an explanation that is not material because it is
philosophically limited to material explanations only...
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Everything has a precise mechanism. Without it no theory is correct.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Dan Hughes
Dan Hughes Yep... that's the assumption of naturalism...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Lights rate of induction changes due to the relative
permittivity and permeability of the medium of induction.
Experimentally demonstrated by Morton Spears.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
隱藏67則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Light is visible alternating current within
atoms/medium/matter. No light travels in vacuum space, light must
coexist with matter.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes and?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If light must coexist with matter, no light travels in
vacuum space. How light from the Sun can light up earth and moon?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Potential travels in a vacuum. It becomes light when it
interacts with gross matter. Also space is not a vacuum as you think
of because there is still vacuum energy density.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman It's not nothing. There is no such thing as empty space.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman You seem to have a problem with the non-physical. What
is your response to the fact that non-local consciousness has been
empirically and experimentally demonstrated?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Do you believe consciousness is a product of the
physical world? Just random chemical reactions in a bag of meat?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman What potential travels in a vacuum? What is
precise mechanism? How it becomes light? What is vacuum energy?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman The air around us only take up 0.1% space,
99.9% space around us is vacuum. Do you agree?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No such thing as nothing. Even the 99.9% is full of energy.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What exactly is energy? How empty space carry energy? Don't
fart, tell the fact.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman It is important to realize that in physics
today, we have no knowledge of what energy is. We do not have a
picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is
not that way. -Feynman
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Where isn't consciousness Joe?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman If consciousness is non-local it must be everywhere
right? Even in a vacuum.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman I am not sure, but I think consciousness only
exist in our little heads. How do you think? What is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
James Allison
James Allison Stefan Dorman . Consciousness is never divided but
instead it’s presence is everywhere right? Not limited by space or
time! Yet, paradoxically, is present at everywhere in space and time-
in every atom and throughout every galaxy!
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Stefan Dorman An act of observation “collapses” the wave
function of potentialities. In other words, our “intention” to
perceive something changes what exists as probabilities, generating
the reality that we then perceive!
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I think consciousness is primary. It exists outside of
time and space. It is everywhere at every scale. It is the sea of
potential we call the aether.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes non local consciousness. There are numerous
evidences for this. My favorite is remote viewing but other studies
like the recent one at Harvard say the same thing. There is no such
thing as local realism.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is An act of observation “collapses” the wave function
of potentialities? What is sea of potential? What is aether made of?
What is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside of the Body & After Death
CONSCIOUSLIFESTYLEMAG.COM
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside…
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside of the Body & After Death
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Fake news. All BS. Similar lie to LIGO detected gravity waves.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No because I personally have had such experiences Joe...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Me two. I smoked salvia, went to a place/heaven and
discovered we are all immortal souls, this life time is but a dream.
But that place is in fact within my head. If consciousness exist, it
must coexist with matter and energy. Empty space has nothing at all.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Even the space around us is 99.9% empty empty space/vacuum.
It is fact.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Smoking salvia is not the same as an out of body
experience. I've done plenty of drugs I know the difference. Beyond
that it can be demonstrated experimentally that it is possible for
remote viewers to see not just other points in space but other moments
in time past/future as well.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I doubt. What is the mechanism? The whole existence of the
whole universe is only at this moment called now. Past and future only
exist in our heads. Time travel is impossible science lie. Simple
fact, cus time is universal, time is not a physical place that can be
visiting/treaveling.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No non-locality is already proven. Think of time like a
wake. Even though the wave only exists at one point at a time the
water that makes the wave both pre and post exists irregardless of the
wave. We are in the wake or the 3D now. But for that wake t……查看更多
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I would also say it's not just past and future that only
exists in our consciousness... everything only exists in our
consciousness.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Scientists say the stars we see are mostly from billions of
years ago. This total lie or mistaken. All stars we see is existing
with us right now, all of them, even those too far away that we cannot
see. Because the whole existence only exist at this moment forever
ongoing now. This simple fact/truth should wake up call for all
people.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Ride the wake brother
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No BS wave for me.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Waves must have wave carrier.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman You seem very stuck on the physical. We are spiritual
beings having a physical experience not physical beings having a
spiritual experience.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes waves must have wave carrier.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am looking forward to learn spiritual knowledge, I think
all physical nature mechanism is already understood.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Then embrace what is there that you cannot see with your eyes.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You should check out my short book. I spent all my life to
search the mechanism of gravity, magnetic force, light,,,,,I found
them all. https://sciencere-volution.
編輯或刪除
Science Revolution
SCIENCERE-VOLUTION.BLOGSPOT.
Science Revolution
Science Revolution
1
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Such as what I cannot see? Field? Force? I can
feel force, but cannot feel field. Can you?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I'll look but you dismiss the aether and believe in
empty space soo honestly what you say does not resonate with me at
all.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Can you see of touch consciousness? Can you see or touch
thoughts or ideas? Can you see or touch the aether?
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is aether? How it works? What is in empty space? I
think we can discuss with open minds.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman It works as a fluid as long as you account for Lorentz
transformations.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman There is no empty space
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman This is why when you trap sound in a fluid it mimics
quantum mechanics and quantum wave function.
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman consciousness is little current in our brain
cells. How aether works as a fluid? What mechanism?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The space between air molecules is empty space, fact or not?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is quantum wave function? Play word puzzle again?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is quantum? Forgot Einstein said quantum is BS?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Tell you truth, by now if you say earth is flat, I won't
argue with you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman The Earth is a flat torus which is topologically
identical to the globe...
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Also the preferred frame of reference for the universe.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Yer sir.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Please teach me more.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Fell asleep.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman The universe appears flat to us in 3D but the actual
shape is determined by the critical density. The critical density of
the universe dictates a closed (spherical or toroidal) universe, and
the CMB best matches math for a flat 3torus universe. A flat 3torus
universe is a universe that looks flat but is actually a hypertorus,
that means if you travel in a straight line you will return to your
original reference frame. In a 3torus universe the twin paradox can
only be resolved with a preferred frame of reference since the twin
accelerating away from Earth will return to Earth without changing
direction. A preferred frame of reference is a location that all
motion, time and scale in the universe are measured against. The CMB
anisotropy data indicates that universal temperature fluctuations and
harmonic oscillations are relative to Earth's "rotation" with the
whole universe neatly divided into northern and southern hemispheres
relative to the elliptical plane of the Earth sun system (flat). Why
do you think someone like Lawrence Krauss would say this implies we
really are at the center of the universe? This is because it really
does imply Earth is this preferred frame of reference and is the
motionless center of the universe. Furthermore the transformation of
the universe from flat to hypertoroidal against Earth as a preferred
frame of reference implies that the Earth is a boundry surface of the
hypertorus itself and by definition also a flat 3torus. This is
convenient since Earth meets the requirements for a flat torus, it has
a smooth fractal surface and is embedded in a higher dimensional
construct. Since the flat torus and 3-sphere are homeomorphic you
essentially end up with Earth as an embedded horizontal coordinate
system. This means it is linear in 3D yet still topologically
identical to the globe.
Sources included.
Critical density of the universe.
https://gsjournal.net/....../
Why critical density determines the actual geometry.
https://www.space.com/34928-
Twin paradox in compact space.
http://cds.cern.ch/record/
Anisotropic dark flow acceleration and the Allais effect.
http://www.scirp.org/journal/
Lawrence Krauss quote.
https://www.goodreads.com/....
The 3-torus universe
https://www.nature.com/....../
Requirements of a flat torus.
http://www.science4all.org/
Why the flat torus and 3-sphere are topologically identical.
http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/.....
Why Earth can't be a 2-sphere.
https://m.phys.org/....../
Earth has a fractal surface.
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/
Horizontal coordinate system.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All BS.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman All experimental evidence for this. Look familiar?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/
隱藏或檢舉此留言
Horizontal coordinate system - Wikipedia
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
Horizontal coordinate system - Wikipedia
Horizontal coordinate system - Wikipedia
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman That coordinate system by the way is one of the most
used by astronomers so you know it represents the sky accurately.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Astronomers think light traveling in space at light speed
are all mistaken, stupid and foolish. This is a fact. Because light
don't travel in space, light only coexist with matter.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Light doesn't have a speed really more like a rate of
induction. A rate determined by the permittivity and permeability of
the medium. That was experimentally demonstrated by Morton Spears.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All theories based on light speed in space is 3 x 10^8 m/s
are false theories. Simple facts. Agreed now?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But you are correct light cannot travel in nothing
because waves need a carrier and a photon is only a magneto-dielectric
pulse. That medium however is the aether and it is everywhere.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes light does not have the same speed in space because
of vacuum permittivity.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman BS. Aether is imaginary.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Just my understanding.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Aether medium subject to Lorentz transformation relative
to Earth as a preferred frame of reference = unified theory of
physics.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
隱藏31則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang aether is imaginary just like photon and graviton and black
hole. All scientists lies. What is the content of aether? What is
aether?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I have already told you it is a non-physical medium
consisting of quantum fluctuations which adheres to fluid dynamics+
Lorentz transformations.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman BS. What is quantum? What is non-physical
medium? You think science is word puzzle or monkey story? Quantum
fluctuations? What is quantum vacuum virtual plasma (NASA's mechanism
for their so called EM drive)?
Science is controlled religi……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman You're repeating yourself Joe and I've already and your questions.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Literally that is copy and paste of the response you
have yesterday that I already answered.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You answered BS. What is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman What is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang See if any scientists can answer that simple question? Neil?
Greener? Mechio Kaku? Go ask them, see how they fart this time?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman They are puppets. Either way I answered your questions yesterday.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman I didn't see it. Can you please tell me again,
what is quantum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you copy and paste yesterday's answer? Please.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Quantum just means a measurement of all things smaller
then the sub atomic scale.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman So what is quantum computer? What is quantum
gravity? What is quantum field?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman What are quantum fluctuations?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Joe Chang The aether is space. Space is the posterior
attribute of the loss of inertia. There is only Force in
motion/inertia and acceleration. Everything is capacitance,
resistance, magnetic permeability and dielectric permittivity. Ken
basically wrote the book on Magnetism! He has published four volumes
on Rediscovering the lost Secrets of magnetism.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang James Allison That's Ken's BS. His magnetism is incorrect.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Space is just empty space. It has no properties. No forces,
fields, no photons, no EM waves, no energy, no aether, nothing at all.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang James Allison You read and believe and repeat. Without
knowing precise mechanism of any theories you repeat. This is not
correct way of science.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang People like you if hold positions in scientific field, will
make science worse.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Already a stinky swamp!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman How can consciousness exist in empty space if there is
nothing there?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.researchgate.net/.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
(PDF) Consciousness in the Universe is Scale Invariant and Implies an
Event Horizon of the Human Brain
RESEARCHGATE.NET
(PDF) Consciousness in the Universe is Scale Invariant and…
(PDF) Consciousness in the Universe is Scale Invariant and Implies an
Event Horizon of the Human Brain
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.nature.com/
隱藏或檢舉此留言
Challenging local realism with human choices
NATURE.COM
Challenging local realism with human choices
Challenging local realism with human choices
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Consciousness only exist in our heads. What makes you think
it exist in space?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Joe Chang I’m having an issue here on where exactly he
is incorrect? Given the basis he started with before publishing his
work and providing the experimental data he always does. Magnetism is
magnetism is magnetism. There is no such thing as magnetic ……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison No such thing as polarity as it is the inverse of counter space.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside of the Body & After Death
CONSCIOUSLIFESTYLEMAG.COM
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside…
New Evidence Proves Consciousness Exists Outside of the Body & After Death
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang James Allison Theory Of Magnetism And Electromagnetic Induction
Ferromagnetic material has a special property – it can be magnetizing
to create temporary magnetic domains.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Joe Chang Electric arrows? You mean centrifugal
divergence and centripetal convergence? So a “bar” magnet would behave
similar to any other magnet whether it’s pyramid shaped, square shaped
or circular shaped. Since polarity is just the inverse of counter
space. Use a Ferro cell and observe the similarities. At least from
what I have observed, there is a Longitudinal plain of inertia in
every magnet.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I mean two next atoms become electrically polarized, 1 atom
positive, 1 atom negative. So called magnet moment.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Ken's word puzzles, such as counter space, centrifugal
divergence are just word puzzles. Imaginary stuff. No batter than
black holes, photons, quantum fields etc BS.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Burt Griswold
Burt Griswold You have them clutching their prayer beads, Joe. What is
the Big Bang if not a reified Creation Myth. It's all a big LARP. A
big, expensive LARP.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The big bang is big fart form some stupid scientists. Are
energy and matter conserved? Yes or no? If yes is correct, the big
bang will be impossible. Do you agree? Why?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Burt Griswold
Burt Griswold In general I try not to have opinions about things I
can't verify. Like the creation of the Cosmos. Evidence would appear
to be weighted on the side of the conservation of energy, though.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang That's fair and rational thinking.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Tim Davies
Tim Davies It does slow down , depends on permitivity of the material
etc. Cus only 300000 km sec in a vacuum
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Light speed in vacuum is infinite. 100% correct.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Tyler Schwarzkopf
Tyler Schwarzkopf Physics and religion need to be separate. Word
definition is what the dissidents lack.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4天
Matt Cohen
Matt Cohen Study thermodynamics and temperature and how it can be calculated...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joey Zuppardo
Joey Zuppardo The scientific method assures that other people can
replicate the experiments. If they come up with something this
disproves yours, then you see how and why and learn to accept it as
truth.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Agree. Can you do the following? Two Easiest Ways To Win the
Nobel Prize
1. Prove light must coexist with matter, and there is no light wave in
the vacuum of space.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison Joe Chang Light is a coaxial circuit of transverse
electrical and magnetic and Longitudinal rarefactions and
compressions. The illumination of light is the dielectric pulse
perturbations created from the rarefactions and compressions via
magnetic and electric fields/energies.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Still Ken's BS. Light is alternating current atoms carried.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang James Allison Go ask Ken what carried E and M force/field in
vacuum space? Aether?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Cue the dudes above saying they “know” the
answers. Ask better questions before you say someone’s answers of the
past are still correct.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Geoffrey Harford
Geoffrey Harford https://l.facebook.com/l.php..
隱藏或檢舉此留言
EINSTEIN and EMPTINESS
THELETHALTEXT.ME
EINSTEIN and EMPTINESS
EINSTEIN and EMPTINESS
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Richard van Amelsfort
Richard van Amelsfort The way I see photons is they behave like
electrons they are everywhere so are photons they don't move much at
all they move then impart their momentum to the next photon untill
they reach our eye so we move through electrons every where so are
photons they even exist in darkness
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang what is photon made of? How photons carry momentum? If
photons have momentum, why Navy laser that can shut down air plan
cannot move a flame? Why light mills don't spin in hard vacuum?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Matthew Donahue
Matthew Donahue Your arguments are trash.illogical trash.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Will Weimer
Will Weimer Science is indeed an exercise in faith
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Please stop repeating a quote from Einstein just
before he died, in 1955. So what? The photoelectric effect is real.
Einstein somewhat got the fame for other's work but again - but so
what? If you cannot accept the photo electric effect, known for
many……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
隱藏33則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The photoelectric effect is BS. If photons have momentum,
why laser beam cannot move a flame? Why light mills don't spin in a
hard vacuum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang So what is quantum computer, quantum energy, quantum state,
quantum field?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Well? No more BS?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - you are stubborn. The photo electric
effect is driven by particular wavelengths for the material. If
someone calls that wavelength a photon, the photoelectric effect is
still real. A wavelength has a related energy; that allows someone to
say the energy of a photon rather than energy of a wavelength. The
selection of words does not define whether the effect is real. It is.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Word salad. If photons have momentum, why laser beam cannot
move a flame? Why cook's radiometer don't spin in hard vacuum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang google and wiki don't have the answer. go ask tyson etc top
guys. see how they fart.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang you sound like a truth seeker and wise guy.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang ask them how 1 electron and 1 proton can form a stable
hydrogen atom? what is precise mechanism?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You want truth, go find out it!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang it is BS to quibble about the use of the
word photon. It appears you also want to discuss all the uses of the
word quantum. I now have no idea where you are trying to take EUT. Do
you want EUT to discuss the terms used when discussing subatomic
particles like the word quark? Can you briefly state your goal for
this post?
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang to find out truth, what else?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang you?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang anyone talks about photon, think it is real particle is a
liar or retard after reading all the comments I made.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang I pointed out the photoelectric effect is
truth but you deny it. I learned the similarities between the
photoelectric effect and an absorption line but you deny the effect.
That denial is not consistent with your goal.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You denial the fact that photons don't have momentum,
otherwise why don't you answer the questions? Science is controlled
religion. No matter how much evidence, the
shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes. For
example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the
godfather of quantum concept said:
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer
to the answer to the question, “What are light quanta?” Nowadays every
Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -
Einstein 1955
Now every scientist photon this, photon that, quantum everything, all
BS. Do you understand?
Neil? How photon can pass through water at same speed without slowing
down like a real particle? How photons can accelerate into air? What
is the mechanism? Magic?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Well, internet down?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Take your time, show me the truth.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - my internet is fine. I see no point in
discussing the use of the word photon. I pointed out we could use the
word wavelength but you persist in seeing a problem with photon...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang I expect EUT is fine with freely mixing
photon or wavelength. If photon is not acceptable then this might be
the wrong group for your problem with that word, photon.
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang David Michalets Wavelength carries momentum? How?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How wavelength knock out electrons from solar cells? What is
precise mechanism?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison David Michalets But the word selection is one of the
most important factors pertaining to science and especially physics.
Punctuation is equally important as any other factor in physics.
Rather. The proper Nomenclature is what separates the smart
individuals from the less smart ones! Any scientist or physicist with
a PHD or masters in their field should know this more than any other
person! Instead. They use numbers to try and describe pressure
mediations and field perturbations!
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How wavelength travels in space at light speed?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Internet down again?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I wish all top scientists are in here with us!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Newton might lo his ass.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Einstein swollowed his dental.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets James Allison - you are correct. Since the
photoelectric effect involves the ejection of an electron the QM term
photon is usually appropriate. It is not 'required.' In this comment
stream there are references to 'light' and to photons. Maybe I am just
too tolerant to accept different terms when I know they are the same
thing.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Yes sir.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How the same thing carries momentum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison David Michalets I’m just saying. Does make a difference
when explaining all this to another individual. It was hammered into
my head by my physics and astronomy teacher lol.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets James Allison - I agree but...my personal problem is I
never had QM in my EE so photon was almost never used; Changing
electron shells did not require a photon, just a particular energy
that could be a wavelength.I learned QM later so it is a 2nd
lang……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
James Allison
James Allison David Michalets You are so right in that aspect there. I
can totally relate. The main issue here isn’t really just the issue
with terminology. It’s the fact that the mainstream cannot swallow
what is the truth even when experimental data and observatio……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Clay Taylor
Clay Taylor Joe Chang, it's actually you who needs to describe what
quantum is, if you say it's bs. It just sounds to me like you don't
even understand the original purpose of the word. By its definition:
-A discrete quantity of energy proportional in magnitude to the
frequency of the radiation it represents.
-An analogous discrete amount of any other physical quantity, such as
momentum or electric charge.
These FACTS of atomic interactions need to be explained by any model.
In your model, why does matter interact in discrete quantity
exchanges? And how do these quantities span a distance?
Also, your use of the electrostatic force, which I agree with,
satisfies a property you are arguing doesn't exist! You say there are
no waves in space, yet you admit to electrostatic waves. You say there
are no fields in space, yet you admit electrostatics connects all
matter. You say there is no aether, yet you miss out on the fact that
many scientists argue the electrostatic field IS the "aether." You are
basically arguing against yourself...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Einstein said quanta is BS. I am just agree with him.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang electrostatic waves are within matter/medium. Electrostatic
connected all matters not field connected them. Many scientists are
BSters.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
檢視另18則回覆
David Michalets
David Michalets Light has its own formula for its energy
The energy in light, in Joules is from this:……查看更多
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
隱藏11則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is angular momentum of light? How matter is converted
in time? Are you just read and copy and repeat any BS without knowing
the mechanism and fact?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - now this is almost funny. I pointed out
the angular momentum of light comes from its electromagnetic fields
(which is the widely accepted fact - or BS in your view) while you
have proposed light is an alternating current without explaining how
that new mechanism works for electrons changing directions without a
defined electrical circuit. I suppose this is stalemate.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How electromagnetic fields carry momentum? What is the mechanism?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang David Michalets My bad. I should explain all science must
based on a correct atomic structure theory, because atoms are the
building blocks of the universe.
Atomic Structure Theory……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Open your minds, pretend you read this from newest textbook
that accepted by Einstein and Newton and Fanyman and Tyson.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang In my dream, they all cried for the joy to kiss my shoe.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Nowadays, the weed is awesome!
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Am I funnier than Ken Wheeler?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I also don't have tattos.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Please don't swallow your dental.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Clay Taylor
Clay Taylor
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Pirow John Rabe
Pirow John Rabe .
......the science (talk to get the job) of BS is NOT gonna last for
long...... supreme knowledge is to occur to everyone on earth
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson The seeming slowing down and speeding up is based on the
interaction of em waves generated by the excited electrons, that then
interact with the incoming light. This interference causes the seeming
change.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
隱藏17則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Where is exited electrons in vacuum space? How electrons get
existed? How em waves are generated? What incoming light from where?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Run out of air?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No friends, scientists and experts can help you out?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No google and wiki can copy and paste?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Eat more peas!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You can get even by asking Tyson or Kaku or greener the same
questions, 300% return rate.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Be brave, find out how they fart, come back and show to us.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Alexander Perinich
Alexander Perinich yeah today it takes three men to pull the wool over
the eyes, as opposed to just the one in Sagan's day
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson Alexander Perinich what is this in reference to?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson Joe Chang electrons inside the material.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Alexander Perinich
Alexander Perinich The fact that today it takes three men (Neil
DeGrassi High, Michio Kacked Himself and Brian Greene-mind) to create
the same propaganda pop science as it did just one in Carl Sagan's
day.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson The light wave passes through the material.
Some of the energy is given to the electrons in that material. The
pertubing of electrons causes an emission of em waves, this emission
(of the material) interferes with the light travelling through the
material, which causes a change in frequency, and wavelength
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson Alexander Perinich I have no idea what you mean by
propaganda, can you elaborate
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Alexander Perinich
Alexander Perinich I feel like the circular logic is even coming full
circle now.
No man, I was being fatuous/sarcastic. Its not funny if you have to
explain it, let alone twice
3
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Alexander Perinich
Alexander Perinich let's hope for some higher-end banter than this
repeated circle jerk that's been happening here lately.....
*unfolllows post*
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Calling names now? Showed your true color.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Ash Johnson How about the light wave/particle traveling in
space at light speed? What electrons is in space? What carries light
waves in the space? What energy? What angular momentum?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Rafal Majak
Rafal Majak Science alone cannot anserw any question about values.
It's a tool. And when your only tool is a hammer all your problems
resemble nails
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Science is controlled religion. No matter how much evidence,
the shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes.
For example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the
godfather of quantum concept said:
All these fifty ye……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Vero Kasisto
Vero Kasisto Science is no such thing. Academic authority is a
globalist dominated corporatized and militarized system.
Science is a tool. The tool is not science.
We need to coherently identify globalists, across nations and
cultures, as spiteful middlemen who serve no purpose other then their
own.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman 235 comments. Joe is onto something. However the
moon landings were real. How did they find all those amazing samples
that actually help our EUT?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
隱藏32則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Internet down again?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang what?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Watch Apollo videos. They must land on the moon at morning
time to avoid high heat. Why many shadows are right under the objects
as if they took the videos at noon time?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang that can’t be your only evidence. WATCH APOLLO 15
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I see a cardboard made dog house on the fake moon.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Waht do you see?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman You have not watched it. Your evidence is lacking
and has been “debunked” already.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How to debunk short shadows?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang easy. You will become worthless very
quickly with your made up conclusions out of thin air. WATCH THE
VIDEOS. 16 is particularly interesting.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did you see those short shadows in 16? How do you explain?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman you’re caught up in the wrong premise.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Just before they take off from the moon, did you see all
shadows are VERY short? What happened? The Sun suddenly come over
their heads?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am so glad that you are helping me to show others how moon
landing is faked.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman You have only one premise and that has been proven
wrong a few times. You’re moving into crazy town really fast.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Yes sir
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Do you think LIGO lied about detected gravity wave?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang lunar surveys in 2009 have lots of
evidence. You can use a telescope and see for yourself the reflectors
left behind.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How they explain away the short shadows?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang lens flare?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 1.38 to 1.56 what happened? ISS turning 90 degrees in few
seconds? Or ISS is fake? https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
ISS Hair V Zero-G Airplane Hair. Fake Space.
YOUTUBE.COM
ISS Hair V Zero-G Airplane Hair. Fake Space.
ISS Hair V Zero-G Airplane Hair. Fake Space.
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman Joe Chang it’s called micro gravity. Not “weightless”.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang After you watched those, if you still think moon landing and
ISS are real, all I can say to you is, opinion various, all is good.
Have a great day!
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Matthew Scheffelman what happened? why she floats up?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天 · 已編輯
Matthew Scheffelman
Matthew Scheffelman there is a difference between good and bad, your
ideas about our universe are great but your conspiracy theories about
the inventions and progress we have made are wrong. Voyager is still
flying.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Yes sir.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Still read fake news and believe?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang And come to repeat to show off?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Your teacher was good
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang tThat's how they got their job.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The Standard Model
Before we understand atoms, how can we learn about the universe? If
the standard model is wrong, then fundamental science will be wrong.
The standard model is recognized by nearly all particle physicists as
wrong in the sense that it is incomplete and only correct in a
phenomenological sense.
When scientists give up and call things the strong force, weak force,
up, down, bottom, top, strange and charming, it says it all.
Scientists think 1 electron and 1 proton are able to form a hydrogen
atom. That is impossible.
The 2 particles attract each other with the strongest attraction force
in nature F=Ke x pe/R^2. The attraction force between an electron and
proton is 10^33 times stronger than 2 neodymium magnets. What force
can separate a proton and an electron?
Therefore, they must stick together under that force. The electron is
impossible to orbit, or become a wave or cloud around the proton to
form a stable atom.
Scientists invented a force called the strong force, which holds
protons together. They forgot to invent another force that keeps
electron away from proton, so atoms are able to form. Why do protons
stick together, but an electron and a proton don't stick together?
They invented the uncertainty principle, wave-particle duality, wave
function collapse, electron shell, orbital, quantum state, energy
level, electron-hole, and the electron cloud. These are all imaginary
made up word puzzles that have nothing to do with reality.
The standard model is like a monkey story.
It is so sad. You’ve got to follow that story to get a degree. You’ve
got to teach that story to become a teacher.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Internet down again?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang meidacom is good, 99.9999 up time.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio what is a graviton?
dr. franklin hall, i presume.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
隱藏46則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Those are top professors proudly, on youtube spreading lies,
can you spot it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
YOUTUBE.COM
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If you can't even tell such simple lie, what science lies
can you tell? I don't blame you read and believe. But I hope to open
your eyes/minds. My own family are just like you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang My brothers think I am crazy, want to send me to hospital.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang After read my book and book review.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I sold few books, only had 1 review.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang They think the review is fake. https://www.amazon.com/dp/
編輯或刪除
Science Revolution: Ten New Theories In Physics and Two Ways To Win
The Nobel Prize
AMAZON.COM
Science Revolution: Ten New Theories In Physics and Two…
Science Revolution: Ten New Theories In Physics and Two Ways To Win
The Nobel Prize
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Free book https://sciencere-volution.
編輯或刪除
Science Revolution
SCIENCERE-VOLUTION.BLOGSPOT.
Science Revolution
Science Revolution
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I wrote to 500 top physics professors around the world, from
MIT to university of Japan. Told them to do experiments to prove
present theory of light is incorrect. NO ONE reply. Why? ……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 500, no 1 reply. WHY? WHY? WHY?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - I must be closed minded like the 500.
Part of the preface has:
'……查看更多
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang the 500 didn't read my book, just a letter suggest them do
the light experiment.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you debunk anything in my book?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you spot what's wrong with those two professors math in
the above video?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - as I said above unless accepted physics is
recognized even if only in the preface I expect turning the page is a
waste of time. Science is an accumulation of knowledge and it requires
a substantial leap to ignore all that has been learned the past. You
should reconsider your foundation to discard all that.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang OK. Can you answer my last two questions?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Anyone else can answer?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio Joe Chang about the video... i don't really
understand why he shifts the second series of one digit when he adds
s2+s2.
2s2 should be 2-4+6-8+10-12+14...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Thanks. Just look at the equation, 3 simple mistakes right
there. 1. The left side is a positive number, the right side is a
negative number. 2. The left side is infinitely large number, the
right side is less than zero. 3. Left for you to spot.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Now can you spot what's wrong with E=MC^2?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why did you insist E=MC^2 is fact?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Are you stupid?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why did you teach that in the class?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio well my brother thinks i'm crazy too but he's
probably right 'cause my mom never gave birth to a second child.
thanks for the link anyway.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Should those lying professors fired?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Those are everywhere in top universities. Do you understand?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio Joe Chang the vampire hunter told dracula: "you
steal men's souls, and make them your slaves!"
and dracula replied: "perhaps the same could be said of all religions".
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you tell right or wrong? Good or bad?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang am I talking to shadow people?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio Joe Chang right=good=1 truth=1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Who wants truth? Who cares truth? What is truth?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Marco M. Malorgio
Marco M. Malorgio Joe Chang nobody wants truth when it brings
uncomfortable consequences. we are creatures of habit.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What truth brings you uncomfortable consequences?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Fake moon landing? Fake ISS? Lying LIGO? Lying professors?
What truth makes you uncomfortable?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Are you feeling bad for been cheated?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why don't you thank me to wake you up?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why don't you go around to wake your other brothers up?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why you want to jerk off?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I rather to be a butterfly next life.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang my heart is bleeding
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang can you paypal me 5?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Any amount is good!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang People are mean,,,,
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Theory Of Matter And Energy
Energy is the motive force carried by moving matter (kinetic energy)
and the alternating current carried in atoms (thermal energy).
An atom is formed from charged particles, therefore energy in the atom
is electric energy.
The matter is formed from atoms, therefore energy in matter is electric energy.
The universe is formed from matters, therefore all of the energy in
the universe is electric energy.
Since charged particles are indestructible, therefore an atom is
indestructible, therefore the matter is conserved.
Since energy coexists with matter, energy is conserved.
All matters are constantly vibrating, moving, acting, changing,
reforming, and evolving.
All the energy comes from atom formation.
When oppositely charged particles attract each other to form an atom,
their potential energy transfers into kinetic energy and is stored
within the atom in the form of alternating current between the
positively charged nucleus and the negatively charged atom ball. This
inherited current is oscillating at radius direction.
Energy can move from matter to matter, but energy cannot transform
into the matter, and energy cannot vanish into the vacuum.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can Newton and Einstein write this theory? Do you like this
theory? Can you accept it? Why?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If this theory is correct, then the big bang is impossible,
the stars are not fusion reactors. Do you agree? Why?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Light travels in air at light speed, in vacuum at infinite
speed. Light don't travel, light induces light over any distance
instantly.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Are they all fake people? All controlled? I really have no
clue. Strangest thing in my life.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I wrote to nobel and breakthrough prize, they never reply either.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang NASA, phy.org, reddit, all science forums, facebook
ifreakinglovescience 18 million people page, all banned my IP. Why?
編輯或刪除
Phy.org - Science: Physics
PHY.ORG
Phy.org - Science: Physics
Phy.org - Science: Physics
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No place will accept my paper, theory and publish it to the
public. Why?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am so lucky to be able to post here!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer please do 10 more posts as quickly as you can, i'm
jerkin off on it realtime. jeez.
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2天
Matthew Donahue
Matthew Donahue me too!shh!
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jörg Kirchhof
Jörg Kirchhof Omg I don't want to know your sexual activities lol
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jana Dixon
Jana Dixon Borg Science is a religion.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 27 fake people thumbs up for this post?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Photons do slow down when passing through differing materials...
Literally that is how optical refraction occurs.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
隱藏13則回覆
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Why light travels in water at 3/4 C speed but accelerate
into air at C speed?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Air's refractive index is about 1.0003, while water's is
about 1.3. This means that light is “slower” in water than air. This
is because it's more likely to hit a molecule and then get re-emitted,
lengthening the amount of time the light takes to get through a
certain distance of the medium.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson This , of course, is also based on frequency of the
light, as some light will refract more due to wavelength.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How about light in vacuum space there is no air molecule?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Then it is at near full speed ( but nothing is devoid of
everything :P )
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson The speed is just "C"... But there are talks about what
makes it that speed... Perhaps the interstellar and intergalactic
medium has different speeds because of the nature of the construction
of the universe.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang A simple way to understand the universe, remember this.
For any matters M1 and M2 at distance R, there are two fundamental
forces constantly at work.
1. Universal attraction force/gravity F=G x M1M2/R^2.
2. Universal repulsion force/levity F=Ke x Q1Q2/R^2. Q1 is the total
charge of line of sight electrons on the surface of M1, Q2 is the
total charge of line of sight electrons on the surface of M2.
These two forces rule the universe. Respond for star formation, stable
orbit, light, radiation, induction, quantum entanglement, all nature
phenomena.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson You do know you are speaking to me right?
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I know you are confused about light.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Well, we use these to calculate the power of
photo-voltaic solar cells and I am and engineer specializing in
them... So....
Not sure what part you would want to disagree with there...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Sunlight is high frequency alternating current in the air.
When the current reaches solar cells, produces DC current. There is no
photon hitting electron out to produce DC current.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Joe Chang Not really. The movement of AC is
longitudinal, whereas EMF is transverse.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 13小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Light is longitudinal. EMF is longitudinal.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 12小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Space does not curve... That would be kinda silly.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Space does not expend, that's another science lie.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 11小時
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson Things are all Quantum today... Back in the 60's they
were Photons...
Buzzwords man.
2
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 60's they said fusion will be reality in 30 years.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Neil Thompson
Neil Thompson They also said Subspace and Warp drive... which will never happen.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Few years ago NASA talk about solar sails and EM Drive. All BS out.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Now they took pic of black hole, might build super detector
in space to scam more $.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang LIGO got more fund already.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang We sheeple can only rant on facebook a little.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Edgars Behmanis
Edgars Behmanis Actually it is - literaly, first scientists were
chatolic monks all basis we are operating today is made by them.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Magnetic force is circular electric force. Magnetic field is
circular electric field. Simple facts. Magnetic field of the earth is
within atmosphere. There is no magnetic field out side of earth
atmosphere.
All those concentric rings/lines are electric force lines. They are
parallel electric force rings induced by the magnets.
Ken, why you deleted my comment? https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The red spot is denser iron deposit induced by the pole.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Eric, Tyson, Kaku, Greener etc never reply my question and
post on their facebook pages, deleted most posts. Why? What is going
on? You guys don't reply, why?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Are you all bots?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Quite happy bots?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer i'm not a bot, its just that youre being nuts again.
didnt i mention the same phenomenon yesterday? do you think spamming
10 posts in a row will bring you anywhere? where is that?
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Forgive me, just too existed, like an electron jumps energy
level, all BS.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Proton-electron attraction force is 10^33 times stronger
than super glue. How can electron jump away from it? Isn't present
theory of atom 100% BS? Open your minds, be fair to yourself.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer why would my mind be closed on this? why do you
accuse all of us here to being too stupid for your ideas? i havent
even thought about it...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer PLEASE REPLY HERE
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I didn't accuse anyone stupid. I even say yes sir to a few.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer yeah, you acted all friendly, for example upon
replying to my reply in a new main string comment
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer MARKED AS SPAM;
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I JOKE A LITTLE, seriously.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Jan Henrik Bauer
Jan Henrik Bauer MARKED AS SPAM
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Dude, come down.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If you discovered some science lies, will you share with
friends, show off in public? Me too. Appreciate the info, don't hate
the messenger.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Any science questions? Be happy to hear it?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
隱藏50則回覆
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman So you only believe in physical particles and emptiness
right? No fields?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Fields are coexist with matters. Empty space has no forces/
fields, no nothing at all. All forces are carried by charged particles
and matters.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang A simple way to understand the universe, remember this.
For any matters M1 and M2 at distance R, there are two fundamental
forces constantly at work.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman What propagates the fields and force?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Between the physical particles explain what carries
forces? If fields what is their medium? Do you think emptiness carries
waves?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Wave is a description of action through a medium. What
is the medium?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman How does something attract or repulse another something
through nothing? What is the exact mechanism?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Hold a magnet in each hand, with the same poles facing each
other. Do you feel the strong repulsion force? Yes.
Wave one hand in and out. Feel the kinetic energy instantly
transferred to the other hand? Yes.
Are the two hands waving at the same frequency? Yes.
Is there any magnetic wave traveling between the two hands? No.
The repulsion magnetic force is the conductor of kinetic energy
between the two hands, enabling kinetic energy to freely transfer
instantly. We can call this phenomenon magnetic radiation.
If we hold electrons in our hands instead of magnets, it is
electrostatic radiation, a misinterpretation of electromagnetic
radiation by scientists.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All atoms are holding electrons on the surfaces. Therefore
line of sight electrons on the surface of the plasma on the Sun and
electrons on the surface of earth outer atmosphere are repelling each
other with Coulomb's force F=Ke x e1e2/R^2, which is 10^33 stronger
than magnetic force. That force transfer light energy instantly
between any distance.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Science call light EM wave, electromagnetic radiation. In
fact, light is electrostatic radiation.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Get it now?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Thank you for the questions!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If you wave 1 hand in and out, the other hand will wave out
and in, this is radiation. If you wave 1 hand up and down, the other
hand will wave down and up, this is induction. All electrostatic, no
EM. Scientists are all messed up.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang There is no EM wave/transverse wave move in vacuum or
medium. Only electrostatic force/wave move in medium. No
light/wave/EMF travels in vacuum at light speed. All scientists are
wrong about light speed in vacuum space is C.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If I don't discover this, if you don't spread this, our
mistaken science of light will never change.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang 500 top professors don't give a fuck. Ken, Tyson, Eric etc
no one gives a fuck. I am fighting alone for years. God is the only
one that helps me. So far.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I discovered antennas don't have current pass through it,
only carry changing voltage few months ago, while posting here.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am 68, last few weeks had 2 ER calls, any time could go
away. All my ideas are at
https://sciencere-volution.
it. Remember Tesla die alone? I might be him in this time frame. My
work has not been noticed yet.
編輯或刪除
Science Revolution
SCIENCERE-VOLUTION.BLOGSPOT.
Science Revolution
Science Revolution
1
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang My poetry for all the woman. http://cigvaporizer.com/asd.
編輯或刪除
a stranger's dream
CIGVAPORIZER.COM
a stranger's dream
a stranger's dream
1
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Tonight might be good time for me to fly away, thank you all.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman What carries the spherical wave oscillations?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Just particles? That's it? I'm seriously asking you? Do
you believe in non physical force carrying fields or do you only
believe is physical particles and empty space?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman The medium. Air/water/matter carries sound
waves and light/radio waves. Within the atoms, oscillating charged
particles/electron/enertron carries electrostatic waves/AC. Charged
particles are the building blocks of the universe. Flesh and soul,
matter and energy. Nothing else.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang That's why no light/em waves in space.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Gravity waves must coexist with matter. We detect earthquake
waves to measure its attitude.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But the mediums of air and water are not continuous.
What's between the particles carrying the waves.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman If no fields, what is charge?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Solid and liquid are continuous. Air is not.
But the repulsion force between air molecules carry the waves.
Remember universal repulsion force between any M1 and M2 at a
distance? F=Ke x e1e2/R^2.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Charge is electric force carried on/with charged fundamental
particles.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Remember the two magnets in your hands? That force
carry/transfer energy instantly.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Liquid is still not continuous the atoms are just closer
together. What carries force between M1 & M2? Gravity wave? What is
waving? Why do two electrons repel. What is the mechanism with no
medium between them? Is it all force through physical contact? What is
between the electron pieces you propose? Nothing?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Electric force? What force? What is carrying the force?
Only electrons bumping together?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Electrons carry negative charge. Same charges repel each
other with Coulomb's force F=Ke x e1e2/R^2. This is accurately
measured fundamental force in the labs. You can't see force but you
can feel it. such as magnetic force and gravity. If you hold same
changed matters, you can measure the repulsion force between them.
Seems you don't have any basic physics knowledge?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Liquids are not compressible, all atoms are connected.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No two atoms ever touch. Too much repulsive force
between electron shells.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman So what mechanism carries this non physical force we can
feel but not see?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What is electron shells? Made from what? Why shells don't
attracted to protons?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did you study physics?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Stay on point. What is the mechanism of action to carry
force between two electrons. No I am a high school dropout who grows
cannabis and reads physics in my spare time.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I do not subscribe to sciencism but I also do not
believe you can have one physical body influence another physical body
with nothing in-between them and no physical contact between them.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman What makes up a field?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I told you there is no field but force. Did you/can you feel
the force between two magnets?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang if you want to learn the mechanism of nature or anything,
you must start from the basics. How's your physics at high school?
Understand the basics?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman BS. Empty space is a fart. There is no such thing as
nothing. If conscious observation and choice influence or dictate
local realism then reality is only a reflection of consciousness.
There can never be nothing because nothing cannot be aware of itself.
Nothing cannot store information.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang OK, maybe you are correct. I am tired. Later.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes I'm well past the basics and I've taught myself
well. Yes I feel the force Joe but I do not believe the magnet is
surrounded by electrons that are imparting physical force. No
electrons are measured in a magnetic field. The insanity of the
standard model assumes virtual photons are the force carriers. Do you
really believe it's just tiny electron pieces bouncing off of each
other and protons in empty space?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Rest well brother I hope you feel better and smoke some
good medicine.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Move a magnet over a copper wire, produces electric current
is fact. The mechanism is magnet carries circular electric force, when
magnet and wire have relative motion, the circular electric force in
the magnet induces electric force/current in the wire. So called
magnetic force is in fact circular electric force carried by magnet
moment in the magnet.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Oh yea, I smoke weed every day for 30 years. Best friends are growers.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I got all physical things figured out. Form atom structure
to star formation. My blog is worth your time and mind. Maybe some day
you will feel it is best weed you never smoked.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 23小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Those are top professors proudly, on youtube spreading lies,
can you spot it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
YOUTUBE.COM
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Read the comments. Can you see how confused the masses are?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Do you like to help them?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Do this first, best weapon for the war. Two Easiest Ways To
Win the Nobel Prize
1. Prove light must coexist with matter, and there is no light wave in
the vacuum of space.……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 1天
Shifu R. Careaga
Shifu R. Careaga Problem is not that they slow down... Problem is how
they instantly speed up. Hence: not particles. Something more.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 12小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Good thinking. What is something more?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Shifu R. Careaga
Shifu R. Careaga Joe Chang something superceding particles and waves
and therefore can appear as both but isn't either in identity
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang How about something is alternating current?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Shifu R. Careaga
Shifu R. Careaga Joe Chang quite likely. Cycling is almost assured
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Cool. Theory Of Light
Light travels in air at light speed, in vacuum at infinite speed.
Light don't travel, light induces light over any distance instantly.
Light is visible alternating current.
Lightwaves must exist within matter.
Lightwaves are longitudinal waves.
Light is not a photon particle.
Light cannot become matter.
Light is the universe's free electricity.
Sunlight stays in Sun's plasma.
Sunlight on earth stays in Sun facing atmosphere.
How does sunlight travel through space to reach us?
Sunlight stays within the plasma on the Sun; sunlight does not travel in space.
Sunlight transfers its energy to earth instantly through an invisible
giant rigid rod.
One end of the rod sets on the Sun's plasma and covers half of the
Sun, while one end sets on earth's atmosphere and covers half of the
earth.
That rod is made of the repulsion force between the line of sight
electrons on the surface of the
Sun's plasma and on the surface of the earth's outer atmosphere. F=Ke
x e1e2/R^2.
That rod of force is, in fact, billions of times stronger than a steel
rod; it locks the atoms touched on both ends as one, conducts
electrical resonance between the Sun and the earth, and keeps
alternating current on the Sun and on earth oscillating at the same
frequency.
The same rod of repulsion force connected all the stars, moons,
planets and every mass in the universe altogether, just like gravity
connected them all together. Gravity pulls all matters together, while
repulsion force pushes all matter apart.
Coulomb discovered repulsion force and attraction forces are like the
hands of God. God holds the universe with his left hand and plays a
love song with his right hand
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 10小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Earth magnetic force/field is very weak, cannot even deflect
lightning direction. How can it deflect high speed moving charged
particles?
How can it protect earth from Sun's radiation or so called/fake solar
wind?……查看更多
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
David Michalets
David Michalets Please use the correct word - dogma -not religion.
This is a discussion about differing views of science. dogma is 'a set
of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.'
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang More common science lies - Van Allen Belts and solar wind
Sun's radiation can only coexist with matter/medium/air/water/glass.
There is no radiation in the vacuum space.
There is no Van Allen Belts. Because there is no radiation out side of
earth atmosphere. There is Sun's radiation on the surface of the moon,
but there is no radiation in the space between Sun and moon.
Radiation/light/EMF/Radiant energy must coexist with matter/medium.
There is no solar wind. What is the mechanism? How solar wind is
produced? How solar wind can escape from Sun's gravity? Why electrons
and protons in the solar wind don't form into hydrogen atoms? What is
solar wind temperature? Where are all the solar wind go? Isn't matter
conserved?
Scientists lied about gravity speed, light speed, black hole, dark
matter, big bang, gravity lensing, space expending, background
radiation. Detected gravity wave, took picture of black hole. moon
landing, space missions, solar sail, EM Drive.
I wonder what's next lie.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
隱藏21則回覆
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang- your selection of words is intended to
disturb the reader rather than enlighten. 'lie' implies the person is
intentionally saying something he knows is wrong. That is never the
case every time you use 'lie' but rather they are making a mist……查看更多
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Cool, opinion various, all is good.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang David Michalets Is this a lie or mistake?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
YOUTUBE.COM
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 9小時
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - a lie is NOT an opinion. 'lie' does not
apply to any of your posts.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you answer the question? Are those professors lied?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - it is neither, it is a joke! A game with
probabilities.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did LIGO lied detected gravity wave?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did NASA lied moon landing?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied took picture of black hole?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied gravity speed is light speed 3x10^8 m/s?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied stars are fusion reactors?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied Sun light takes 8 minutes to reach us?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied that transverse electric wave and
magnetic wave traveling in space at light speed?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied about gravity lensing that gravity can
bend light, in fact it is plasma on the Sun bend light?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did scientists lied that 23 watts transmitter on Voyager can
sent picture from that far away, and the pictures gets more clear as
farther away?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did NASA lied about solar sails are working in space?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Did NASA lied about EM Drive is working few years back?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Can you handle the truth?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
David Michalets
David Michalets Joe Chang - I find it fascinating you are stuck on
gravitational waves in the EUT site.
On August 20 I posted that every LIGO detection occurs near an earth
tide event. An earth tide is a slow moving wave in the crust as the
earth rotates with the moon overhead, just as an ocean tide is a slow
moving wave on the ocean.
The earth tide especially a new moon or full moon, apparently triggers
the LIGO system to check their data for a match and over the 19 earth
tide events LIGO has found 35 detections. In my view these events
trigger their analysis sequence. In my view there is no 'real' wave
detected. In their view their system is detecting what they are
looking for.That's why they got their award.
I am not the person to explain the confusion in LIGO. They are not
telling a lie. They believe it, so they are making a mistake.
Eventually we can hope to point out their mistakes but calling them
liars won't help.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang BS. Any rational thinker knows gravity is coexisting with
matters and must be instantaneous force, otherwise no planets can have
stable orbit. How can LIGO teams don't know that fact?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Like those lying professors don't know positive number
cannot equal to negative number?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman What about when the plasma crystalizes?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Plasma with high charge density and low temperature will
crystalize according to it's Coulomb interaction in microgravity.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 9小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang THC can crystalize. Plasma I doubt. Plasma only exist in
high temperature. You are full of it in physics, smoke your green,
read the basics, don't BS too much.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
隱藏58則回覆
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Plasma crystallization is experimentally demonstrated.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman "In this project we studied the lattice structure of
dusty plasma Coulomb
crystls formed in rectangular conductive grooves as a function of plasma
temperature and density. The crystal appears to be made of mutually
repulsive……查看更多
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I think it is fake data, another science lie.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman More likely to crystalize in microgravity. The "Van
Allen belts" are plasma with high charge density and low temperature
in microgravity...
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What plasma in around earth? Plasma is on the Sun. There is
no plasma on earth or moon, no plasma in space.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Also yesterday you said liquid does not compress. So
what about superionic water?
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Where is it? Did you tried it is not compressible? How?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Superionic water is also experimentally demonstrated.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All lies.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman https://www.researchgate.net/.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Don't quote anything, something original.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman "what plasma around Earth?"
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Not only is it plasma with high charge density and low
temperature in microgravity it is contained by a magnetic field.
https://m.phys.org/news/2015-
隱藏或檢舉此留言
Made to order: Researchers discover a new form of crystalline matter
PHYS.ORG
Made to order: Researchers discover a new form of…
Made to order: Researchers discover a new form of crystalline matter
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang All BS. There is no high energy charged particles. There is
no plasma around earth or moon. Pasma only exist on the Sun.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時 · 已編輯
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman It also is mandatory once you understand gravity is
electrostatic capacitance potential. Dielectrophoresis requires
asymmetrical plates and by definition the smaller plate will have the
relatively negative charge. The voltage gradient potential between the
Earth and atmospheric boundry is an average of 100V/m
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Read and believe and copy and paste and show off. I read you
kind people like a book. Please stop it.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Dielectrophoresis you and I can demonstrate for
ourselves with a comb and a tap of water.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Morton Spears experimentally demonstrated that gravity
can be calculated as electrostatic capacitance potential. The force on
an asymmetrical capacitor is easy to demonstrate. The ice bucket
experiment is an easy way to demonstrate the E-field gradient coming
off of the Earth.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman No need for books go try yourself.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Only believe what can be achieved at scale. Follow logic
before all else.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Go ahead to do the double slit experiment ia a vacuum glass
container. If you are serious. Don't show off your read knowledge,
everyone can read those. I don't want to argue or discuss science with
you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Before you do the experiment and report results.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But to say you believe the data on crystalline plasma is
being faked is a big stretch because many experiments have shown the
same results. You can find many different sources for such
information. I find it works better to dispute the interpretation
rather then the data.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman If I had access to such equipment I would love to do
such experiments Joe.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But through experiments I have seen my friends preform
if you put a laser straight through the one of the lens of a pair of
3D glasses you get the same diffraction pattern as the double slit
experiment. However if the laser approaches 90° perpendicular to he
lense the diffraction pattern becomes a circle.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman An experiment everyone can try
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman At this angle the diffraction pattern changes from a
horizontal linear pattern to a perfect circle.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
未提供相片說明。
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman I sent you some short videos.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 7小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Vacuum pump, large glass container. You have
laser pointer, camera, make a slits is eazy. someone in this group
said he is going to do it few weeks ago, I forgot his name. Wonder
what happened?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 6小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I watched both few times. I know lot more scientific BS.
Only the double slit in vacuum experiment can prove light must coexist
with matter, therefore present theory is wrong. When many people do
the same and post videos, the mainstream must accept the fact and
rewrite textbooks.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 6小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang The best way to fight for truth that I can figure out.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 6小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman You cannot achieve a sufficient vacuum with any pump I
can afford brother.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Light must co-exist with matter but not potential.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman Not true, AC man vacuum pump is good enough.
See those youtube channel like Cody's lab etc. Those pumps are good
enough to disappear light wave interfrences.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang What potential?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang You can ask high school or college labs to help you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang They got everything needed.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman The magneto-dielectric potential.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Well I have one of the one stage pumps and I think a
laser pointer I'll let you know if it makes the interference
disappear.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Awesome! We can change the history soon,
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang No magneto-dielectric potential. Only electric force at
work. Gravity and magnetic force are all electrostatic force at
different arrangement or configuration.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Magnetic force is circular electric force carried by
circular magnetic domains. Gravity is net electrostatic force between
all charged particles in all matters.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Tonight when it's darker and you can see it better I'll
send you picture of the interference pattern in the "vacuum".
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 4小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman You mean there is still interference pattern
in the vacuum? Nothing changes?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang That is impossible. Cus nothing can wave in the vacuum space
to make wave pattern interference.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Waves must coexist with matter/medium/air/water/glass.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Well it's very faint especially since my laser is weak
and it's light out but I'd say yes it's still there. I will take a
video for you tonight.
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Yes though waves can only exist in a medium. That's why
the aether is logically unavoidable.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Cool, thank you very much!
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Cool, thank you very much!
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Stefan Dorman You mean aether is in the vacuum container
that carried light wave?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Aether causes photoelectric effect?
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang See 1.50, 6.03, 10.43, make sure you did it correct, have
enough distance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?
編輯或刪除
$10 Double-slit Experiment Vs. $2500 Double-slit Experiment
YOUTUBE.COM
$10 Double-slit Experiment Vs. $2500 Double-slit Experiment
$10 Double-slit Experiment Vs. $2500 Double-slit Experiment
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman Mine is much more low budget I did it like this
basically but in a small 6×8×4 vacuum chamber. Yes though the aether
is everywhere, even in a vacuum. It is the fluid "fabric" of
reality.https://youtu.be/
隱藏或檢舉此留言
How To Make Your Own Double Slit Experiment (Young's) - Easy At-Home Science
YOUTUBE.COM
How To Make Your Own Double Slit Experiment (Young's) -…
How To Make Your Own Double Slit Experiment (Young's) - Easy At-Home Science
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman But my laser pointer is a bird shaped laser pointer cat toy lol.
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Stefan Dorman目前在線上
Stefan Dorman And my vacuum chamber is for purifying cannabis concentrates lol
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Still good enough to try it out.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2小時
Joe Chang
回覆……
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Don;t shame your good stuff.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Michael McDuffey
Michael McDuffey These are the sort of conversations that I live for!!!
1
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang Thank you sir, me too, me too.
1
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 8小時
Rob Blair
Rob Blair #naturalscience
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang https://www.quora.com/What....
編輯或刪除
What would happen if black holes pulled things via electromagnetic
force rather than gravity?
QUORA.COM
What would happen if black holes pulled things via electromagnetic…
What would happen if black holes pulled things via electromagnetic
force rather than gravity?
讚
· 回覆 · 移除預覽 · 5小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang PhD from MIT? Stupid monkeys..
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 5小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang His internet is down.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang When 5% of the masses know those professor/PhD are monkeys,
our science edu will be much better.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang If you read all 500 comments here, if you are not in the 5%,
you must be the rest %. God bless you.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 4小時
David Scott
David Scott Joe Chang so you admit there is a god
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 3小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang God is in my heart and head for sure. I am stupid so what?
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2小時 · 已編輯
Joe Chang
Joe Chang David Scott tell your lady leave me alone.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 · 2小時
David Scott
David Scott Joe Chang that's why they got pain pills right
隱藏或檢舉此留言
讚
· 回覆 · 2小時
Joe Chang
Joe Chang I am not her pills.
編輯或刪除
讚
· 回覆 ·
On 8/30/19, Science Revolution <oxivape@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joe Chang
> 話題高手 · 8月26日下午1:58 · tag新增主題
> Science is controlled religion. No matter how much evidence, the
> shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes. For
> example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the
> godfather of quantum concept said:
>
> All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer
> to the answer to the question, “What are light quanta?” Nowadays every
> Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -
> Einstein 1955
>
> Now every scientist photon ⋯⋯
> 更多
> 36James Allison、Keredine A Ghannoum和其他34人
> 525則留言
> 讚
> 留言
> 留言
> Peter Scott-Morgan
> Peter Scott-Morgan Are you drunk?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang I don't drink. You?
> 1
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Peter Scott-Morgan
> Peter Scott-Morgan Joe Chang no, but I don’t talk about farting with a
> load of monkeys...
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> 檢視另7則回覆
> Josh Rozenfeld
> Josh Rozenfeld I would suggest business, not religion.
> 4
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Jan Henrik Bauer
> Jan Henrik Bauer photon does!!!!!! slow down underwaterz. read again!
> 1
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Steve Schrader
> Steve Schrader there are no photons, therefore they cannot "slow down"
> 2
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Jan Henrik Bauer
> Jan Henrik Bauer the photon energy slows down.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> 檢視另5則回覆
> Shawn Edward
> Shawn Edward 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 bruuuuh. You needa stop smokin them fuckin
> dick hairs...
> 1
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones
> Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones Come on Joe Chang, need a link please.
> Get the truth out there. I understand your despise for mainstream, you
> are right but pass on the knowledge.....I am trying to get what you
> are saying....? I thought you might like this, your
> thoughts........https://www.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
> YOUTUBE.COM
> 💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
> 💎 More Secrets of Magnetism 🤓💎
> 4
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Ken's theory of magnetism is incorrect. Theory Of Magnetism
> And Electromagnetic Induction
> Ferromagnetic material has a special property – it can be magnetizing
> to create temporary magnetic domains.……查看更多
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Tyler Schwarzkopf
> Tyler Schwarzkopf Graham Leslie Hurlstone-jones tattooed buddha 😂
> he’s a fun guy to listen to though I’ll give him that
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> 檢視另 1 則回覆
> Dan Hughes
> Dan Hughes Science is philosophical naturalism... science can never
> return an explanation that is not material because it is
> philosophically limited to material explanations only...
> 1
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天 · 已編輯
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Everything has a precise mechanism. Without it no theory is
> correct.
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Dan Hughes
> Dan Hughes Yep... that's the assumption of naturalism...
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 3天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Lights rate of induction changes due to the relative
> permittivity and permeability of the medium of induction.
> Experimentally demonstrated by Morton Spears.
> 1
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> 隱藏67則回覆
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Light is visible alternating current within
> atoms/medium/matter. No light travels in vacuum space, light must
> coexist with matter.
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Yes and?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang If light must coexist with matter, no light travels in
> vacuum space. How light from the Sun can light up earth and moon?
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Potential travels in a vacuum. It becomes light when it
> interacts with gross matter. Also space is not a vacuum as you think
> of because there is still vacuum energy density.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman It's not nothing. There is no such thing as empty space.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman You seem to have a problem with the non-physical. What
> is your response to the fact that non-local consciousness has been
> empirically and experimentally demonstrated?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Do you believe consciousness is a product of the
> physical world? Just random chemical reactions in a bag of meat?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Stefan Dorman What potential travels in a vacuum? What is
> precise mechanism? How it becomes light? What is vacuum energy?
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Stefan Dorman The air around us only take up 0.1% space,
> 99.9% space around us is vacuum. Do you agree?
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman No such thing as nothing. Even the 99.9% is full of energy.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang What exactly is energy? How empty space carry energy? Don't
> fart, tell the fact.
> 1
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Stefan Dorman It is important to realize that in physics
> today, we have no knowledge of what energy is. We do not have a
> picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is
> not that way. -Feynman
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman Where isn't consciousness Joe?
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Stefan Dorman目前在線上
> Stefan Dorman If consciousness is non-local it must be everywhere
> right? Even in a vacuum.
> 隱藏或檢舉此留言
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> Joe Chang
> Joe Chang Stefan Dorman I am not sure, but I think consciousness only
> exist in our little heads. How do you think? What is quantum?
> 編輯或刪除
> 讚
> · 回覆 · 4天
> James Allison
> James Allison Stefan Dorman . Consciousness is never divided but
> instead it’s presence is everywhere right? Not limited by space or
> time! Yet, paradoxically, is present at everywhere in space and time-
> in every atom and throughout every galaxy!
> 1
>
