▼

Sunday, September 1, 2019

Science is controlled religion. No matter how much evidence, the shameless mainstream scientists refuse to accept their mistakes. For example, Nobel Prize winner of photoelectric effect theory, the godfather of quantum concept said:
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, “What are light quanta?” Nowadays every Tom, Dick, and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. - Einstein 1955

Now every scientist photon this, photon that, quantum everything, all BS. Do you understand?

Neil? How photon can pass through water at the same speed without slowing down like a real particle? How photons can accelerate from glass into air? What is the mechanism?

How matter tells space how to curve? How space tells matter how to move? 

Do you know when you are farting, many monkeys are farting at the same time at many different places?
James Allison、Keredine A Ghannoum和其他36人
582則留言

讚
留言
留言

顯示先前的留言
30/88
  • David Michalets Please use the correct word - dogma -not religion. This is a discussion about differing views of science. dogma is 'a set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.'
  • Joe Chang More common science lies - Van Allen Belts and solar wind

    Sun's radiation can only coexist with matter/medium/air/water/glass. There is no radiation in the vacuum space.

    There is no Van Allen Belts. Because there is no radiation out side of earth atmosphere. There is Sun's radiation on the surface of the moon, but there is no radiation in the space between Sun and moon. Radiation/light/EMF/Radiant energy must coexist with matter/medium.

    There is no solar wind. What is the mechanism? How solar wind is produced? How solar wind can escape from Sun's gravity? Why electrons and protons in the solar wind don't form into hydrogen atoms? What is solar wind temperature? Where are all the solar wind go? Isn't matter conserved?

    Scientists lied about gravity speed, light speed, black hole, dark matter, big bang, gravity lensing, space expending, background radiation. Detected gravity wave, took picture of black hole. moon landing, space missions, solar sail, EM Drive.

    I wonder what's next lie.
    1

    隱藏54則回覆

    • David Michalets Joe Chang- your selection of words is intended to disturb the reader rather than enlighten. 'lie' implies the person is intentionally saying something he knows is wrong. That is never the case every time you use 'lie' but rather they are making a mist……查看更多
    • Joe Chang Cool, opinion various, all is good.
      1
    • ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
      YOUTUBE.COM
      ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
      ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12

    • David Michalets Joe Chang - a lie is NOT an opinion. 'lie' does not apply to any of your posts.
    • Joe Chang Can you answer the question? Are those professors lied?
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - it is neither, it is a joke! A game with probabilities.
    • Joe Chang Did LIGO lied detected gravity wave?
    • Joe Chang Did NASA lied moon landing?
    • Joe Chang Did scientists lied took picture of black hole?
    • Joe Chang Did scientists lied gravity speed is light speed 3x10^8 m/s?
    • Joe Chang Did scientists lied stars are fusion reactors?
    • Joe Chang Did scientists lied Sun light takes 8 minutes to reach us?
    • Joe Chang Did scientists lied that transverse electric wave and magnetic wave traveling in space at light speed?
    • Joe Chang Did scientists lied about gravity lensing that gravity can bend light, in fact it is plasma on the Sun bend light?
    • Joe Chang Did scientists lied that 23 watts transmitter on Voyager can sent picture from that far away, and the pictures gets more clear as farther away?
    • Joe Chang Did NASA lied about solar sails are working in space?
    • Joe Chang Did NASA lied about EM Drive is working few years back?
    • Joe Chang Can you handle the truth?
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - I find it fascinating you are stuck on gravitational waves in the EUT site.
      On August 20 I posted that every LIGO detection occurs near an earth tide event. An earth tide is a slow moving wave in the crust as the earth rotates with the moo      ……查看更多
    • Joe Chang BS. Any rational thinker knows gravity is coexisting with matters and must be instantaneous force, otherwise no planets can have stable orbit. How can LIGO teams don't know that fact?
    • Joe Chang Like those lying professors don't know positive number cannot equal to negative number?
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - are you familiar with the term 'joke' ???
    • Joe Chang LIGO was joking???
    • David Michalets Joe Chang NO - the silly adding of numbers then making an assumption with probabilities you can get a negative number. THAT is the joke.
    • Joe Chang Really? My bad, I thought they are spreading math lies. Thank you for correcting me.
    • Joe Chang Not my fault, my poor English.
    • Joe Chang Was LIGO lied?
    • David Michalets Joe Chang LIGO is not a lie. They believe they detected what they expected. Someone who doubts there is a gravity wave will treat their claim as a mistake, based on their wrong assumptions.If you claim they lied then YOU are saying they are 'evil scientists' but they are not.
    • Joe Chang Any rational thinker should know gravity is coexisting with matters and must be instantaneous force, otherwise no planets can have stable orbit. How can LIGO teams don't know that fact?
    • Joe Chang Does Tyson lied saying space tells matter how to move, matter tells space how to curve?
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - simple - with relativity gravity is limited to the velocity of light, which we know here in EUT is a wrong assumption or a mistake.
    • Joe Chang Does he know the precise mechanism? Can he explain it in English?
    • Joe Chang David Michalets Do you agree magnetism in EUT is incorrect?
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - Tyson will explain using relativity not EUT. He has the wrong basis - but the one used by most cosmologists.
    • Joe Chang No matter using what theory, his explanation sounds all BS to me.
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - that is because you doubt spacetime curvature but he believes it.
    • Joe Chang Do you believe? What is space-time curvature? Mechanism?
    • David Michalets Joe Chang spacetime curvature is immediate but gravity is not - in relativity. Do you see the difference when listening to Tyson or others?
    • Joe Chang All BS so far.
    • Joe Chang Have not hear any theory is totally correct.
    • Joe Chang Except a few, such as Newtons motion and gravitation, coulomb's force, conservation laws etc,.
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - I certainly will not defend relativity here in EUT. EUT is the better theory in my view.
    • Joe Chang Sure. EUT is the best so far, too bad shameless mainstream refuse to accept any better theories.
    • Joe Chang David Michalets I improved a little for EUT, such as better magnetism theory, add new fundamental force/universal levity/repulsion force. Define all energy must be electric energy etc,.
    • Joe Chang Such as all forces are based on electric force. Light is AC in the medium. No light/energy/photon traveling in space at light speed. Sun is stable AC generator not fusion reactor.
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - The answer to your question:
      spacetime curvature mechanism: a gravitational field distorts the observer's reference frame so his motion is affected in this geometry to move toward the body in a path like for gravity. With relativity the observer is moving in space time not in 3D space like with Newton's laws. Relativity 'allows' the observer to approach the speed of light, Einstein's speed limit (and most agreed in the year 1900), except there is no such limit. That is an underlying mistake in relativity. Red shifts z > 1 are observed.
      Spacetime curvature is a mathematical abstraction between the observer and real space. The 'mechanism' is math not physics.
    • Joe Chang How gravitational field distorts the observer's reference frame? Word salad?
    • Joe Chang Gravity can only attract mass. Gravity has nothing to do with space or time.
    • Joe Chang Because space or time and time don't carry mass. Is that understandable?
    • David Michalets Joe Chang - the words apply to the mathematical layer. There are no words using physics because relativity is a theoretical layer of math. EUT is not the group to debate relativity; EUT is for EU.
    • Joe Chang OK. Let's see what are missing in EUT, let's improve it?
    • Joe Chang Got open mind for this?
    • Joe Chang Or EUT people are just like mainstream, don't accept better theories?
    • Joe Chang Internet down?
    回覆……

at

No comments:

Post a Comment